Paper · 2024 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effect of Biofertilizer and Nano-Fe Oxide Foliar Application on Alleviation of Water Deficit in Yield and Some Physico-Chemical Properties of Barley

R. Seyed Sharifi; R. Khalilzadeh; S. Dadashzadeh

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The use of biological systems and nano-micronutrients are gaining increased attention since they are more ecofriendly on plant growth under water stress. The aim of this study was to investigate the response of yield, physiological, and chemical characteristics of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to water deficit, biofertilizers and iron Nano-oxide in the field condition. Treatments were included biofertilizers [application of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi (AMF), PGPR + AM-fungi and not application as control]; nutrition with nano-iron oxide (control, application of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 g/L) and irrigation levels [normal irrigation, moderate and severe water limitation]. The results showed that water limitation caused a decrease in SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), Fv/Fm, relative water content, and grain yield of barley, whereas electrical conductivity, proline, soluble sugars, and enzyme activities increased. Combined interactions between 0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide with AM-fungi + PGPR ameliorated adverse effects by enhancing RWC and proline, which might result from of lower electrical conductivity. The highest proline was detected in plants exposed to the highest nano-Fe oxide and mycorrhiza + Azospirillum application, at all irrigation levels. Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities increased by 44.7, 105.3, and 107.5% in plants treated with mycorrhiza and PGPR under severe water limitation. Iron deficiency induced several changes in catalase and peroxidase enzymes and reduced their activities under water deficit. In severe water-stressed plants, the application of AM-fungi and PGPR caused an increase in grain yield by 10.35%. Spraying of 0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide and application of mycorrhiza + Azospirillum could be suitable for barley growth and production in semi-arid areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation lowered SPAD, Fv/Fm, relative water content and grain yield.

Treatment
water limitatione0
Outcome
SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), Fv/Fm, relative water content, and grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation caused a decrease in SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development), Fv/Fm, relative water content, and grain yield of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation increased electrical conductivity, proline, soluble sugars and enzyme activities.

Treatment
Water Deficitt0
Outcome
electrical conductivity, proline, soluble sugars, and enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas electrical conductivity, proline, soluble sugars, and enzyme activities increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Water Deficit in Yield and Some Physico-Chemical Properties of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nano-iron and AM fungi plus PGPR increased relative water content and proline.

Treatment
0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide with AM-fungi + PGPRe0
Interactor
AM-fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
RWC and prolinee0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined interactions between 0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide with AM-fungi + PGPR ameliorated adverse effects by enhancing RWC and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest proline occurred with maximum nano-iron and mycorrhiza plus Azospirillum at every irrigation level.

Treatment
highest nano-Fe oxide and mycorrhiza + Azospirillum applicatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
highest prolinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest proline was detected in plants exposed to the highest nano-Fe oxide and mycorrhiza + Azospirillum application, at all irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased catalase activity by 44.7% under severe water limitation.

Treatment
mycorrhiza and PGPRe0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
Catalasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities increased by 44.7, 105.3, and 107.5% in plants treated with mycorrhiza and PGPR under severe water limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased peroxidase activity by 105.3% under severe water limitation.

Treatment
mycorrhiza and PGPRe0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
peroxidasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
105.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities increased by 44.7, 105.3, and 107.5% in plants treated with mycorrhiza and PGPR under severe water limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza and PGPR increased polyphenol oxidase activity by 107.5% under severe water limitation.

Treatment
mycorrhiza and PGPRe0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
107.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase activities increased by 44.7, 105.3, and 107.5% in plants treated with mycorrhiza and PGPR under severe water limitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deficiency reduced catalase and peroxidase activity under water deficit.

Treatment
Iron deficiencye0
Outcome
catalase and peroxidase enzymese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron deficiency induced several changes in catalase and peroxidase enzymes and reduced their activities under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi and PGPR increased grain yield 10.35% under severe water stress.

Treatment
application of AM-fungi and PGPRe0
Interactor
AM-fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Second interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In severe water-stressed plants, the application of AM-fungi and PGPR caused an increase in grain yield by 10.35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–148 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend nano-iron spraying with mycorrhiza and Azospirillum for barley production in semi-arid areas.

Treatment
Spraying of 0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide and application of mycorrhiza + Azospirillume0
Outcome
barley growth and productione0
Setting
semi-arid arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying of 0.9 g/L nano-Fe oxide and application of mycorrhiza + Azospirillum could be suitable for barley growth and production in semi-arid areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1868 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 6 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

nanoparticle · Glomeromycota · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.