Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Assessing the Efficacy and Economics of Selected Insecticides against Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on Cowpea [Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp]

Aniket Rana; Ashwani Kumar

19
claims
68
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present field investigation was carried out in the Prayagraj district of Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was conducted in Kharif season 2023-2024 at Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj district. The field layout chosen was RBD with seven treatments and controlled plot. To check the “Efficacy and economics of selected insecticides against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on cowpea Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp”. The result of the efficacy of the treatments after first spray showed that the Chlorantraniliprole (1.66) found out to be most effective. Followed by Spinosad (1.95) and Indoxacarb (2.22). Treatments Imidacloprid (2.33) and Fipronil (2.44) was found to be average. Bacillus thuringiensis (2.55) and Azadiractin (Neem Oil ) (2.64) found to be less effective in managing the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera. According to the second spray of showed that Chlorantraniliprole (1.02) was found to be the most effective. Followed by Spinosad (1.42) and Indoxacarb (1.64). Treatments Imidacloprid (1.95) and Fipronil (2.1) was found to be average. Bacillus thuringiensis (2.31) and Azadiractin (Neem oil ) (2.44) found out to be less effective in managing the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera but comparatively superior over control. In another parameter higher yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole (24.08 q/ha) followed by Spinosad (22.50 q/ha), Indoxacarb (17.20 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (13.70 q/ha) and Azadiractin (Neem oil ) (12.60 q/ha) as compared to control (10.50 q/ha). The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in treatment of Chlorantraniliprole (1:3.51), followed by Spinosad (1:2.85), respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Chlorantraniliprole (1.66) was the most effective against Helicoverpa armigera larvae on cowpea.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
efficacye1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
1.66e1
Qualifier
after first spraye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result of the efficacy of the treatments after first spray showed that the Chlorantraniliprole (1.66) found out to be most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Spinosad (1.95) followed Chlorantraniliprole in effectiveness.

Treatment
Spinosade1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
Followed bye1
Direction
Followed bye1
Value
1.95e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Followed by Spinosad (1.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Indoxacarb (2.22) followed Spinosad in effectiveness.

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
Followed bye1
Direction
Followed bye1
Value
2.22e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Followed by Spinosad (1.95) and Indoxacarb (2.22)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Imidacloprid (2.33) and Fipronil (2.44) were of average effectiveness.

Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
averagee1
Direction
averagee1
Value
2.33e1
Qualifier
Fipronil (2.44)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments Imidacloprid (2.33) and Fipronil (2.44) was found to be average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Bacillus thuringiensis (2.55) was less effective in managing Helicoverpa armigera larvae.

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
less effectivee1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
2.55e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus thuringiensis (2.55) and Azadiractin (Neem Oil ) (2.64) found to be less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the first spray, Azadiractin (neem oil) (2.64) was less effective in managing Helicoverpa armigera larvae.

Treatment
Azadiractin (Neem Oil )e1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
less effectivee1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
2.64e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus thuringiensis (2.55) and Azadiractin (Neem Oil ) (2.64) found to be less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Chlorantraniliprole (1.02) was the most effective.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1
Value
1.02e1
Qualifier
second spraye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“second spray of showed that Chlorantraniliprole (1.02) was found to be the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Spinosad (1.42) followed Chlorantraniliprole in effectiveness.

Treatment
Spinosade1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
Followed bye1
Direction
Followed bye1
Value
1.42e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Followed by Spinosad (1.42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Indoxacarb (1.64) followed Spinosad in effectiveness.

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
Followed bye1
Direction
Followed bye1
Value
1.64e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Followed by Spinosad (1.42) and Indoxacarb (1.64)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Imidacloprid (1.95) and Fipronil (2.1) were of average effectiveness.

Treatment
Imidaclopride1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
averagee1
Direction
averagee1
Value
1.95e1
Qualifier
Fipronil (2.1)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments Imidacloprid (1.95) and Fipronil (2.1) was found to be average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Bacillus thuringiensis (2.31) was less effective against the larval population but comparatively superior over control.

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
larval population of Helicoverpa armigerae1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
2.31e1
Qualifier
comparatively superior over controle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus thuringiensis (2.31) and Azadiractin (Neem oil ) (2.44) found out to be less effective in managing the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera but comparatively superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After the second spray, Azadiractin (neem oil) (2.44) was less effective against the larval population but comparatively superior over control.

Treatment
Azadiractin (Neem oil )e1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
larval population of Helicoverpa armigerae1
Direction
less effectivee1
Value
2.44e1
Qualifier
comparatively superior over controle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus thuringiensis (2.31) and Azadiractin (Neem oil ) (2.44) found out to be less effective in managing the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera but comparatively superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was higher with Chlorantraniliprole (24.08 q/ha) than control (10.50 q/ha).

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.08 q/hae1
Qualifier
10.50 q/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield was recorded in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control (10.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorantraniliprole (24.08 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was higher with Spinosad (22.50 q/ha) than control (10.50 q/ha).

Treatment
Spinosade1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.50 q/hae1
Qualifier
10.50 q/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield was recorded in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control (10.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spinosad (22.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was higher with Indoxacarb (17.20 q/ha) than control (10.50 q/ha).

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.20 q/hae1
Qualifier
10.50 q/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield was recorded in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control (10.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Indoxacarb (17.20 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was higher with Bacillus thuringiensis (13.70 q/ha) than control (10.50 q/ha).

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensise1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.70 q/hae1
Qualifier
10.50 q/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield was recorded in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control (10.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus thuringiensis (13.70 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield was higher with Azadiractin (neem oil) (12.60 q/ha) than control (10.50 q/ha).

Treatment
Azadiractin (Neem oil )e1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.60 q/hae1
Qualifier
10.50 q/hae2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield was recorded in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to control (10.50 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1540 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azadiractin (Neem oil ) (12.60 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained with Chlorantraniliprole (1:3.51).

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprolee1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1:3.51e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest cost benefit ratio was obtained in treatment of Chlorantraniliprole (1:3.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad had the next highest cost benefit ratio (1:2.85).

Treatment
Spinosade1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat1pest
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
followed bye1
Value
1:2.85e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Helicoverpa armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest cost benefit ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1572 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by Spinosad (1:2.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1661 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

imidacloprid · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.