Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology /Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology

EVALUATION OF SOME NON-TRADITIONAL PESTICIDES AGAINST THE TWO POD BORERS Helicoverpa armigera AND Etiella zinckenella POPULATION INFESTING COWPEA IN THE NEWLY RECLAIMED REGIONS

Gehan Abdou,; E. Abdalla

18
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The two pod borers Helicoverpa armigera Hubner and Etiella zinckenella Treitschke are the most destructive insect pests which infest several crops of leguminosae in Egypt. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of some relatively safe compounds beside the conventional pesticides for control of these pests on cowpea, Vigna ungiculata under the conditions of newly reclaimed regions. The results revealed that most of the treatments were able to suppress the levels of infestation to different degrees according to the nature of the tested compounds and the number of sprays applied. Application of non-traditional compounds such as thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid group) or Indoxacarb (oxadiazine group) significantly reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70% and E. zinkenella by 58 and 55%, respectively. Plots sprayed with methoxyfenozide (non-steroid ecdysone agonist )provided satisfactory control (60% reduction) against H. armigera population while exerted weak activity(< 26%) against E. zinkenella population. On the other hand, the potency of the common neurotoxic pesticides; chlorpyrifos (organophosphate) or cypermethrin (pyrethroid) were still the most effective pesticides against both species giving 76-81% reduction in infestation. However, all the tested pesticides and the rates used had low residual effect against the two insects and thus, weekly applications to protect the plants of new insect attack were necessary. The treatments received six applications, throughout the entire season, effectively contained the damage caused by pest population more than those received four or two applications. At harvest, high grain yield was obtained in the plots treated 6 times with the tested compounds. In general, Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%). Moreover, remarkable elevation in the percentages of damaged grains (~ 28.0%) was recorded in all treatments sprayed twice throughout the season, while the corresponding values in those received 6 applications were restricted within 13.6-16.4%. The effectiveness and moderate persistence of such new compounds, beside their low mammalian toxicity make them promising agents when used alone or with other control measures on cowpea plantations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam significantly reduced H. armigera larval populations by 76% on cowpea.

Treatment
thiamethoxame1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval populations of H. armigerae1
Direction
reducede1
Value
76e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid group) or Indoxacarb (oxadiazine group) significantly reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb significantly reduced H. armigera larval populations by 70% on cowpea.

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
larval populations of H. armigerae1
Direction
reducede1
Value
70%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid group) or Indoxacarb (oxadiazine group) significantly reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam significantly reduced E. zinkenella larval populations by 58% on cowpea.

Treatment
thiamethoxame1
Interactor
E. zinkenellae2pest
Outcome
larval populationse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
58e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid group) or Indoxacarb (oxadiazine group) significantly reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70% and E. zinkenella by 58 and 55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb significantly reduced E. zinkenella larval populations by 55% on cowpea.

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Interactor
E. zinkenellae2pest
Outcome
larval populationse2
Direction
reducede2
Value
55%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“thiamethoxam (neonicotinoid group) or Indoxacarb (oxadiazine group) significantly reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduced the larval populations of H. armigera by 76 and 70% and E. zinkenella by 58 and 55%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methoxyfenozide provided satisfactory control of H. armigera population (60% reduction) on cowpea.

Treatment
methoxyfenozidee3
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae3pest
Outcome
H. armigera populatione3
Direction
satisfactory controle3
Value
60%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plots sprayed with methoxyfenozide (non-steroid ecdysone agonist )provided satisfactory control (60% reduction) against H. armigera population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos or cypermethrin were the most effective pesticides, giving 76-81% reduction in infestation on cowpea.

Treatment
chlorpyrifos (organophosphate) or cypermethrin (pyrethroid)e5
Outcome
infestatione5
Direction
reductione5
Value
76-81%e5
Qualifier
most effective pesticidese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“chlorpyrifos (organophosphate) or cypermethrin (pyrethroid) were still the most effective pesticides against both species giving 76-81% reduction in infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1281 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested pesticides and rates had low residual effect against the two insects on cowpea.

Treatment
all the tested pesticides and the rates usede6
Outcome
residual effecte6
Direction
lowe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e6

“all the tested pesticides and the rates used had low residual effect against the two insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1384 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that weekly applications were necessary to protect cowpea plants from new insect attack.

Outcome
weekly applications to protect the plants of new insect attacke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“weekly applications to protect the plants of new insect attack were necessary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six applications effectively contained pest damage on cowpea more than four or two applications.

Treatment
six applicationse0
Outcome
damage caused by pest populatione0
Direction
effectively containede0
Comparator
four or two applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treatments received six applications, throughout the entire season, effectively contained the damage caused by pest population more than those received four or two applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated six times with the tested compounds gave high grain yield on cowpea.

Treatment
treated 6 times with the tested compoundse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“At harvest, high grain yield was obtained in the plots treated 6 times with the tested compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyrifos gave a 45.9% yield increase over the untreated control on cowpea.

Treatment
Chlorpyrifose1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
45.9%e1
Comparator
untreated control valuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam gave a 41.6% yield increase over the untreated control on cowpea.

Treatment
Thiamethoxame1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
41.6%e1
Comparator
untreated control valuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb gave a 39.0% yield increase over the untreated control on cowpea.

Treatment
Indoxacarbe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
39.0%e1
Comparator
untreated control valuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin gave a 38.8% yield increase over the untreated control on cowpea.

Treatment
Cypermethrine1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
38.8%e1
Comparator
untreated control valuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methoxyfenozide gave a 33.9% yield increase over the untreated control on cowpea.

Treatment
Methoxyfenozidee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
33.9%e1
Comparator
untreated control valuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chlorpyrifos was the superior compound being registered (45.9%) increase in yield over the untreated control value, followed by Thiamethoxam (41.6%), Indoxacarb (39.0%), Cypermethrin (38.8%) then Methoxyfenozide (33.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments sprayed twice raised the percentage of damaged grains to about 28.0% on cowpea.

Treatment
sprayed twice throughout the seasone1
Outcome
percentages of damaged grainse1
Direction
elevatione1
Value
~ 28.0%e1
Comparator
those received 6 applicationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“remarkable elevation in the percentages of damaged grains (~ 28.0%) was recorded in all treatments sprayed twice throughout the season, while the corresponding values in those received 6 applications were restricted within 13.6-16.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six applications restricted the percentage of damaged grains to 13.6-16.4% on cowpea.

Treatment
received 6 applicationse1
Outcome
percentages of damaged grainse1
Direction
restricted withine1
Value
13.6-16.4%e1
Comparator
sprayed twice throughout the seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“INFESTING COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“remarkable elevation in the percentages of damaged grains (~ 28.0%) was recorded in all treatments sprayed twice throughout the season, while the corresponding values in those received 6 applications were restricted within 13.6-16.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider these new compounds promising agents for pod borer control on cowpea plantations.

Outcome
promising agentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“make them promising agents when used alone or with other control measures on cowpea plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2334–2429 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorpyrifos · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorpyrifos · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.