Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Efficacy of different combination of insecticides against spotted pod borer in cowpea [Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp.]

Swathi Yadav Kattula; HV Pandya; Birakati Swarnalata

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Different combinations of insecticides were tested on cowpea crop against spotted pod borer (Maruca vitrata) during 2012-2014 at different time intervals and revealed that lowest M. vitrata population was recorded in the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.90 larva/plant). The next effective treatments were acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant) and thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant). The highest M. vitrata population was observed in control (4.18 larvae/plant). Maximum reduction of larvae was found in the treatments in which spinosad is present followed by the treatments in which novaluron is present. Imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SC recorded the lowest spotted pod borer damage with 5.61 per cent damage. With respect to BCR, highest BCR (1:8.70) was registered in the treatment imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC which was followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:6.52) and acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:6.43).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid with spinosad yielded the lowest M. vitrata population at 0.90 larva/plant.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SCe0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
M. vitrata populatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.90 larva/plante0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest M. vitrata population was recorded in the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.90 larva/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest M. vitrata population was observed in control (4.18 larvae/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid with spinosad was the next effective treatment, at 0.98 larva/plant.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with spinosad 45 SCe0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
M. vitrata populatione1
Direction
effectivee0
Value
0.98 larva/plante0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The next effective treatments were acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant) and thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest M. vitrata population was observed in control (4.18 larvae/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam with spinosad was the next effective treatment, at 0.98 larva/plant.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with spinosad 45 SCe0
Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
M. vitrata populatione1
Direction
effectivee0
Value
0.98 larva/plante0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The next effective treatments were acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant) and thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with spinosad 45 SC (0.98 larva/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest M. vitrata population was observed in control (4.18 larvae/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated control had the highest M. vitrata population, at 4.18 larvae/plant.

Interactor
M. vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
M. vitrata populatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.18 larvae/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest M. vitrata population was observed in control (4.18 larvae/plant).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations containing spinosad had the greatest larval reduction, followed by those containing novaluron.

Treatment
spinosade0
Outcome
reduction of larvaee0
Direction
Maximum reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum reduction of larvae was found in the treatments in which spinosad is present followed by the treatments in which novaluron is present.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid with spinosad yielded the lowest pod borer damage, 5.61 per cent.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SCe0
Interactor
spotted pod borere0pest
Outcome
spotted pod borer damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
5.61 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with spinosad 45 SC recorded the lowest spotted pod borer damage with 5.61 per cent damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid with indoxacarb had the highest BCR of 1:8.70.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1:8.70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest BCR (1:8.70) was registered in the treatment imidacloprid 17.8 SL in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam with indoxacarb had the next highest BCR, 1:6.52.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
Outcome
BCRe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1:6.52e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam 25 WG in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:6.52)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“With respect to BCR, highest BCR (1:8.70) was registered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid with indoxacarb had a BCR of 1:6.43.

Treatment
acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SCe0
Outcome
BCRe1
Value
1:6.43e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetamiprid 20 SP in combination with indoxacarb 14.5 SC (1:6.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1137 · show in text ↑
e1

“With respect to BCR, highest BCR (1:8.70) was registered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

imidacloprid · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acetamiprid · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.