Paper · 2020 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION

Field efficacy of new generation insecticides for the management of spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.) in cowpea

B.K. Singh; Rakesh Pandey; A.K. Singh; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea.The aim of this study was to evaluate the field efficacy of new generation insecticides against spotted pod borer.Field experiments were conducted at Regional Research Station, Nasik (Maharashtra) on cowpea during Kharif, 2009 and 2010.Among the new generations tested, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (4.79%) was observed significantly higher, in reducing the damage caused by the spotted pod borer in cowpea, on number basis followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/l (7.99%) and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (8.70%).The highest marketable yield (91.49 q/ha) was recorded in flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l followed by spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (91.39 q/ha).However, the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1).On the basis of efficacy, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l was observed to be very effective against Maruca vitrata in cowpea followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 20 WG significantly reduced spotted pod borer damage in cowpea (4.79 %), the strongest reduction among the insecticides tested.

Treatment
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le1
Interactor
spotted pod borere0pest
Outcome
damage caused by the spotted pod borere1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
4.79%e1
Comparator
new generations testede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the new generations tested, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (4.79%) was observed significantly higher, in reducing the damage caused by the spotted pod borer in cowpea, on number basis followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/l (7.99%) and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (8.70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5SC reduced spotted pod borer damage in cowpea (7.99 %), followed flubendiamide.

Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/le1
Interactor
spotted pod borere0pest
Outcome
damage caused by the spotted pod borere1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
7.99%e1
Comparator
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the new generations tested, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (4.79%) was observed significantly higher, in reducing the damage caused by the spotted pod borer in cowpea, on number basis followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/l (7.99%) and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (8.70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC reduced spotted pod borer damage in cowpea (8.70 %), followed flubendiamide.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/le1
Interactor
spotted pod borere0pest
Outcome
damage caused by the spotted pod borere1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
8.70%e1
Comparator
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the new generations tested, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (4.79%) was observed significantly higher, in reducing the damage caused by the spotted pod borer in cowpea, on number basis followed by indoxacarb 14.5SC @ 0.5 ml/l (7.99%) and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (8.70%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 20 WG gave the highest marketable yield of cowpea (91.49 q/ha), above spinosad.

Treatment
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le2
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
91.49 q/hae2
Comparator
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/le2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest marketable yield (91.49 q/ha) was recorded in flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l followed by spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (91.39 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC gave a marketable yield of cowpea of 91.39 q/ha, followed flubendiamide 20 WG.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/le2
Outcome
marketable yielde2
Direction
followed bye2
Value
91.39 q/hae2
Comparator
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest marketable yield (91.49 q/ha) was recorded in flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l followed by spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (91.39 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodicarb 75 WP gave the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) in cowpea.

Treatment
thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/le3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
1:3.2e3
Comparator
indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/le3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5 SC gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:2.3 in cowpea, followed thiodicarb.

Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/le3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
followed bye3
Value
1:2.3e3
Comparator
thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/le3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.9 in cowpea, followed thiodicarb.

Treatment
spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/le3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
followed bye3
Value
1:1.9e3
Comparator
thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/le3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5 SG gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.3 in cowpea, followed thiodicarb.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/le3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
followed bye3
Value
1:1.3e3
Comparator
thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/le3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 20 WG gave a cost benefit ratio of 1:1.1 in cowpea, the lowest of the insecticides listed.

Treatment
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le3
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
followed bye3
Value
1:1.1e3
Comparator
thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/le3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the maximum cost benefit ratio (1:3.2) was recorded in thiodicarb 75 WP @ 1 g/l followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l (1:2.3),spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l (1:1.9),emamectin benzoate 5 SG @ 0.5 g/l (1:1.3),flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l (1:1.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–1001 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 20 WG is recommended as very effective against Maruca vitrata in cowpea, followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC and spinosad 45 SC.

Treatment
flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/le4
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
very effective against Maruca vitratae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.)causes significant damage by attacking pods in cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“On the basis of efficacy, flubendiamide 20 WG @ 1.0 g/l was observed to be very effective against Maruca vitrata in cowpea followed by indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 0.5 ml/l and spinosad 45 SC @ 0.3 ml/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1196 · show in text ↑

flubendiamide · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiodicarb · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · quality: postharvest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

flubendiamide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

indoxacarb · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

spinosad · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.