Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Efficacy and Economics of Selected Insecticides against Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata (Fab.) in Cowpea

Kunjum Pradeeprao Likhitkar; Ashwani Kumar

20
claims
52
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trail was conducted at Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif season 2023 at central research farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments replicated thrice times were evaluated against Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC, Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC, Nisco sixer plus, Beauveria bassiana1.15%WP, Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG, Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% and Control. Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95), Spinosad45%SC (1.15) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC (1.35), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% ( 1.64 ) and Nisco sixer plus (1.75), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP, (1.95) whereas Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) (2.15) was found to be least effective against this pest. The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha). Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG produced a larval population of 0.95.

Treatment
Emamectin Benzoate 5%SGe0
Interactor
spotted pod borere0pest
Outcome
cowpea spotted pod borere0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad45%SC produced a larval population of 1.15.

Treatment
Spinosad45%SCe0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
1.15e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad45%SC (1.15) was found to be the next best treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC produced a larval population of 1.35.

Treatment
Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%ECe0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
1.35e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin 4%EC (1.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% produced a larval population of 1.64.

Treatment
Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5%e0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
1.64e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% ( 1.64 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nisco sixer plus produced a larval population of 1.75.

Treatment
Nisco sixer pluse0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
1.75e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nisco sixer plus (1.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP produced a larval population of 1.95.

Treatment
Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WPe0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
1.95e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP, (1.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) produced a larval population of 2.15.

Treatment
Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm)e0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
larval populatione2
Value
2.15e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (300ppm) (2.15) was found to be least effective against this pest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–955 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata i.e. Spinosad45%SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–309 · show in text ↑
e2

“lowest larval population of cowpea spotted pod borer was recorded in Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (0.95)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG yielded 36.66 q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Emamectin Benzoate 5%SGe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
36.66 q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad45%SC yielded 34.83 q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Spinosad45%SCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
34.83 q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC yielded 33.66 q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%ECe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
33.66 q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% yielded 32.48q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
32.48q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nisco sixer plus yielded 28.30 q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Nisco sixer pluse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
28.30 q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP yielded 27.60q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WPe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
27.60q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP yielded 26.05q/ha, versus 16.85 q/ha in control plots.

Treatment
Azadirachtin 0.03% WSPe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
26.05q/hae0
Qualifier
16.85 q/hae0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plot treated with Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG show highest yield (36.66 q/ha) followed by Spinosad45%SC (34.83 q/ha), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (33.66 q/ha), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (32.48q/ha), Nisco sixer plus (28.30 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (27.60q/ha) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (26.05q/ha) as compared to control plot (16.85 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG had an economic ratio of 1:3.55, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Emamectin Benzoate 5%SGe0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
beste0
Value
1:3.55e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45%SC had an economic ratio of 1:3.11, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Spinosad 45%SCe0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1:3.11e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC had an economic ratio of 1:3.24, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%ECe0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1:3.24e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% had an economic ratio of 1:2.71, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5%e0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1:2.71e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nisco sixer plus had an economic ratio of 1:2.39, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Nisco sixer pluse0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1:2.39e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP had an economic ratio of 1:2.34, compared with 1:1.20 for control.

Treatment
Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WPe0
Outcome
most economical treatmente0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1:2.34e0
Qualifier
1:1.20e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the treatments the best and most economical treatment was Emamectin Benzoate 5%SG (1:3.55) followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.11), Profenofos 40%+ Cypermethrin4%EC (1:3.24), Spinosad45%SC + Neem oil5% (1:2.71), Nisco sixer plus (1:2.39), Beauveria bassiana1.15 %WP (1:2.34) and Azadirachtin 0.03% WSP (1:2.16) as compared to control plot (1:1.20)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1662 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

azadirachtin · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

profenofos · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cypermethrin · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

botanical · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.