Abstract
Abstract The effect of humic fertilizers of domestic (ECO-SP) and foreign (Fulvigrain Classic, Gumiful Pro) production on the yield and quality of spring barley grain of the Prometheus variety was studied. The cultivation was performed as follows. Without treatment with humic fertilizers (control); ECO-SP: seed treatment (0.5 L/t) + treatment of plants in the tillering phase (0.5 L/ha) + treatment of plants in the stem elongation phase (0.5 L/ha); Fulvigrain Classic: seed treatment (0.8 L/t) + treatment of plants in the tillering phase (0.4 L/ha) + treatment of plants in the stem elongation phase (0.4 L/ha); Humiful Pro: seed treatment (0.1 L/t) + processing of plants in the tillering phase (0.1 L/ha) + processing of plants in the stem elongation phase (0.1 L/ha). The work was carried out in 2020–2022 in the Kursk Federal Agrarian Scientific Center (Kursk oblast, Kursk district, Cheryomushki village). The soil of the experimental site is a typical powerful, heavy-loamy chernozem. The treatment of spring barley seeds with humic fertilizers was found to increase their germination energy by 2–7%, and laboratory germination by 3–5% if compared with the seeds untreated with humic fertilizers. When processing seeds and plants with humic fertilizers, the yield of spring barley increased by 0.46–0.56 t/ha or by 12.7–15.5%, the grain size, by 0.7–1.6%, the protein content, by 0.2–0.4%, and the starch, by 0.4–0.9%. Higher yields of spring barley were provided by ECO-SP and Fulvigrain Classic humic fertilizers, 0.52.and 0.56 t/ha respectively. The efficacy of Humiful Pro humic fertilizer was lower: the yield increase was 0.46 t/ha or 12.7%, the grain size increased by 0.7%, the protein content, by 0.6%, and the starch, by 0.3% if compared with the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased barley seed germination energy by 2–7%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2–7%e0
- Comparator
- seeds untreated with humic fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of spring barley seeds with humic fertilizers was found to increase their germination energy by 2–7%, and laboratory germination by 3–5% if compared with the seeds untreated with humic fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased laboratory germination by 3–5%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- laboratory germinatione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3–5%e0
- Comparator
- seeds untreated with humic fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of spring barley seeds with humic fertilizers was found to increase their germination energy by 2–7%, and laboratory germination by 3–5% if compared with the seeds untreated with humic fertilizers.”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased yield by 0.46–0.56 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yield of spring barleye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.46–0.56 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“When processing seeds and plants with humic fertilizers, the yield of spring barley increased by 0.46–0.56 t/ha or by 12.7–15.5%, the grain size, by 0.7–1.6%, the protein content, by 0.2–0.4%, and the starch, by 0.4–0.9%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased grain size by 0.7–1.6%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerst0
- Outcome
- grain sizee0
- Value
- 0.7–1.6%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the grain size, by 0.7–1.6%”
t0“Humic Fertilizers in the Cultivation of Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased protein content by 0.2–0.4%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerst0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Value
- 0.2–0.4%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the protein content, by 0.2–0.4%”
t0“Humic Fertilizers in the Cultivation of Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic fertilizers increased starch content by 0.4–0.9%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- humic fertilizerst0
- Outcome
- starche0
- Value
- 0.4–0.9%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the starch, by 0.4–0.9%”
t0“Humic Fertilizers in the Cultivation of Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
ECO-SP increased yield by 0.52 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- ECO-SPe0
- Outcome
- yields of spring barleye0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 0.52e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Higher yields of spring barley were provided by ECO-SP and Fulvigrain Classic humic fertilizers, 0.52.and 0.56 t/ha respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fulvigrain Classic increased yield by 0.56 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- Fulvigrain Classice0
- Outcome
- yields of spring barleye0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 0.56 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Higher yields of spring barley were provided by ECO-SP and Fulvigrain Classic humic fertilizers, 0.52.and 0.56 t/ha respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Humiful Pro increased yield by 0.46 t/ha relative to control.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- Humiful Proe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.46 t/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of Humiful Pro humic fertilizer was lower: the yield increase was 0.46 t/ha or 12.7%, the grain size increased by 0.7%, the protein content, by 0.6%, and the starch, by 0.3% if compared with the control.”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Humiful Pro increased grain size by 0.7%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- Humiful Proe0
- Outcome
- grain sizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.7%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of Humiful Pro humic fertilizer was lower: the yield increase was 0.46 t/ha or 12.7%, the grain size increased by 0.7%, the protein content, by 0.6%, and the starch, by 0.3% if compared with the control.”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Humiful Pro increased protein content by 0.6%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- Humiful Proe0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.6%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of Humiful Pro humic fertilizer was lower: the yield increase was 0.46 t/ha or 12.7%, the grain size increased by 0.7%, the protein content, by 0.6%, and the starch, by 0.3% if compared with the control.”
t0“Spring Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Humiful Pro increased starch by 0.3%.
- Taxon
- spring barley
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- Humiful Proe0
- Outcome
- starche0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.3%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of Humiful Pro humic fertilizer was lower: the yield increase was 0.46 t/ha or 12.7%, the grain size increased by 0.7%, the protein content, by 0.6%, and the starch, by 0.3% if compared with the control.”
t0“Spring Barley”
The same questions in other papers
other · quality: sugar starch · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
other · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →other · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →other · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
161 papers more in this group
See all 165 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.