Paper · 2004 · Plant Soil and Environment

Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea

J. Akhter; K. Mahmood; K.A. Malik; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
277
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The hydrogel amendments may improve seedling growth and establishment by increasing water retention capacity of soils and regulating the plants available water supplies, particularly under arid environments. The effects of different levels of a locally prepared hydrogel were studied on the moisture properties of sandy loam and loam soils (fine-loamy, mixed, hyperthermic Typic Haplargids, USDA, Luvic Yermosol, FAO) and on growth response of three plant species, viz. barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Water absorption by gel was rapid and highest in distilled water and was inhibited by an increase in water salinity. The addition of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% hydrogel increased the moisture retention (θr) at field capacity linearly (r = 0.988) and thus the amount of plant available water significantly in both sandy loam and loam soils compared to the untreated soils. Seed germination of wheat and barley was not affected but seedling growth of both species was improved by the gel amendment. In loam soil, seed germination of chickpea was higher with 0.2% gel and seedling growth increased with increase in gel level compared with control conditions. The hydrogel amendment caused a delay by 4-5 days in wilting of seedlings grown in both soils compared with control conditions. The hydrogel amendment was effective in improving soil moisture availability and thus increased plant establishment. However, the varied responses of plant species in sandy loam and loam soils warrant further studies on the behaviour of different soil types with gel amendments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel absorbed water most rapidly and strongly in distilled water, while salinity inhibited absorption.

Outcome
Water absorption by gele0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
distilled watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water absorption by gel was rapid and highest in distilled water and was inhibited by an increase in water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 0.1–0.3% hydrogel increased field-capacity moisture retention linearly in both soils versus untreated soil.

Treatment
0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% hydrogele0
Outcome
moisture retention (θr)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
r = 0.988e0
Comparator
untreated soilse0
Setting
sandy loam and loam soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% hydrogel increased the moisture retention (θr) at field capacity linearly (r = 0.988) and thus the amount of plant available water significantly in both sandy loam and loam soils compared to the untreated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel increased plant-available water significantly in both soils.

Treatment
0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% hydrogele0
Outcome
plant available watere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated soilse0
Setting
sandy loam and loam soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% hydrogel increased the moisture retention (θr) at field capacity linearly (r = 0.988) and thus the amount of plant available water significantly in both sandy loam and loam soils compared to the untreated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel did not affect wheat seed germination.

Treatment
gel amendmente0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination of wheat and barley was not affected but seedling growth of both species was improved by the gel amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel did not affect barley seed germination.

Treatment
gel amendmente0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination of wheat and barley was not affected but seedling growth of both species was improved by the gel amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel improved wheat seedling growth.

Treatment
gel amendmente0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination of wheat and barley was not affected but seedling growth of both species was improved by the gel amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel improved barley seedling growth.

Treatment
gel amendmente0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination of wheat and barley was not affected but seedling growth of both species was improved by the gel amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loam soil, 0.2% gel increased chickpea seed germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
0.2% gele0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control conditionse0
Setting
loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In loam soil, seed germination of chickpea was higher with 0.2% gel and seedling growth increased with increase in gel level compared with control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loam soil, chickpea seedling growth increased with gel level.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
gel levele0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control conditionse0
Setting
loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In loam soil, seed germination of chickpea was higher with 0.2% gel and seedling growth increased with increase in gel level compared with control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel delayed seedling wilting by 4-5 days in both soils versus control.

Treatment
hydrogel amendmente0
Outcome
wilting of seedlingse0
Direction
delaye0
Value
4-5 dayse0
Comparator
control conditionse0
Setting
both soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hydrogel amendment caused a delay by 4-5 days in wilting of seedlings grown in both soils compared with control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel increased plant establishment.

Treatment
hydrogel amendmente0
Outcome
plant establishmente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hydrogel amendment was effective in improving soil moisture availability and thus increased plant establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley, wheat and chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–125 · show in text ↑

other · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

other · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

other · soil: physics · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.