Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of enhanced doses of phosphorous and zinc fertilizers over recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF) on grain yield and its attributes in wheat (Triticum durum L.)

Pargati .; Ishwar Singh; RK Behl; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Effect of enhanced doses of Phosphorous and Zinc fertilizers over recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF) on grain yield and its attributes in wheat (Triticum durum L.) was conducted at field research farm of Department of Agriculture, MM(DU), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana during winter season of 2023. The field experiment was laid out in a Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with three replications and four treatments applied to three durum wheat varieties WHD 943, WHD 965 and WHD 948. The treatments were control (T1), (T2) 100% RDF (recommended doses of fertilizers) i.e., Nitrogen-150 kg/ha through Urea (50% basal dose + urea 25% at after 25 days of sowing + 25% at pre flowering), Phosphorous-60 kg/ha through SSP (100% basal dose), Potassium- 60 kg/ha through Muriate of Potash (100% as basal dose) and ZnSo4-25 kg/ha, (T3) 25% higher ZnSo4 + RDF, (T4) 25% higher P2O5 + RDF. The data were recorded on plant growth parameters, grain yield and its components namely plant height, dry weight accumulation per meter row length, total no. of tillers running per meter row length, number of spikes per meter row length, number of grains per spike, test weight, grain yield, straw yield and biological yield. Indices namely harvest index, cost of cultivation, gross return, net returns and benefit cost ratio were computed. The comparative evaluation of various treatments revealed that 25% enhanced doses of Phosphatic and Zinc fertilizers gave good response and higher yield as compared to RDF. The increase in yield due to application of 25% higher phosphorous (46.3 q/ha) as well as zinc (42.4 q/ha) was significantly higher over RDF (39.0 q/ha) and control (27.6 q/ha). Treatments T4 showed highest gross returns (Rs. 139970/ha) and net returns (Rs. 73152.44/ha) as well as higher benefit cost ratio (2.09).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% higher phosphorus dose produced 46.3 q/ha grain yield, significantly above RDF and control.

Treatment
25% higher phosphorouse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
46.3 q/hae0
Qualifier
control (27.6 q/ha)e0
Comparator
RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yield due to application of 25% higher phosphorous (46.3 q/ha) as well as zinc (42.4 q/ha) was significantly higher over RDF (39.0 q/ha) and control (27.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum durum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% higher zinc dose produced 42.4 q/ha grain yield, significantly above RDF and control.

Treatment
zince0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.4 q/hae0
Comparator
RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in yield due to application of 25% higher phosphorous (46.3 q/ha) as well as zinc (42.4 q/ha) was significantly higher over RDF (39.0 q/ha) and control (27.6 q/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum durum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had the highest gross returns of Rs. 139970/ha.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 139970/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T4 showed highest gross returns (Rs. 139970/ha) and net returns (Rs. 73152.44/ha) as well as higher benefit cost ratio (2.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum durum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had net returns of Rs. 73152.44/ha.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
Rs. 73152.44/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T4 showed highest gross returns (Rs. 139970/ha) and net returns (Rs. 73152.44/ha) as well as higher benefit cost ratio (2.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum durum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had a higher benefit cost ratio of 2.09.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T4 showed highest gross returns (Rs. 139970/ha) and net returns (Rs. 73152.44/ha) as well as higher benefit cost ratio (2.09).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum durum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–167 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.