Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Investigation of Zn Use Efficiency and Zn Fertilization Efficiency in Some Genotypes of Wheat

P. Keshavarz; M. Forouhar; M. Dadivar

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Introduction: World cereal demand is growing at the present in accordance with the global expansion of human populations.Bread wheat is the most widely grown cereal grain with 65% (6.5 million hectares) of the total crop cultivated area in Iran. Deficiency of micronutrients in cereal cropping is one of the major worldwide problems. Zinc (Zn) is an essential micronutrient for plants. It plays a key role as a structural constituent or regulatory co-factor of a wide range of different enzymes and proteins in many important biochemical pathways. Nearly half of the world’s cereal-growing areas are affected by soil zinc deficiency, particularly in calcareous soils of arid and semiarid regions. High pH levels and bicarbonate anion concentration in these soils are the major factors resulting in low availability of Zn. About 40% of the soils, used for wheat production in Iran are Zn-deficient, which results in a decrease in growth and wheat grain yield under field conditions. Although application of zinc fertilizers is a common practice to correct Zn deficiency, growing varieties with high Zn efficiency has been reported to be a more sustainable approach. There is significant genetic variation both within and between plant species in their ability to maintain significant growth and yield under Zn deficiency conditions. Plant response to Zn deficiency and Zn fertilization are two distinct concepts. Knowing about these variations, can be very essential and useful for making correct fertilizer recommendation. Materials and Methods: In order to investigate Zn efficiency in various wheat genotypes, a factorial experiment as a randomized complete block design was carried out with three replications in agricultural research center of Khorasan razavi (Torough Station), during 2009-2011. Treatments consisted of two levels of Zn fertilizer (0 and 40 kg/h as ZnSO4) and six genotyps of wheat including: three cultivars and one line of bread wheat (Alvand, Falat, Toos, and C75-5 respectively), two species of wheat known as Thriticosecale and Durum. The plot size was 9*3.6 (32.4 m2). Soil fertility status showed 0.05% nitrogen, 7.2 mgkg-1 phosphorus, 180 mgkg-1 potassium and 0.52 mgkg-1 DTPA extractable zinc. At defined phonological stage (SG6 based on Fix’s Index) Zn concentration in shrub was measured. Also grain yield and Zn uptake by grain were determined at the end of ripening stage. Zinc use efficiency, agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery efficiency were calculated according to “Graham, et al.”, “Craswell and Godwin” and “Raun and Johnson” respectively. Zinc use efficiency can be defined as the ratio of grain yield or shoot dry matter yield produced under Zn deficiency to that produced under Zn fertilization. Results and Discussion: Grain yield is the most integrative trait of a particular genotype. The results showed that Zn application increased significantly grain yield by 12.61% in comparison with control. This result is supported by Ziayeian and Malakouti (1999). Who reported that Zn application significantly increased the wheat yield (17%). In our research the highest grain yield increase due to Zn application was found in durum wheat (23.5%), and the lowest grain yield increase, were found in Toos cultivar (1.3% yield increase). Cakmak and et al (1997) also obtained more yield with the application of zinc in durum wheat. Application of Zn increased Zn concentration and uptake in grain, 8.6% and 21.5% respectively. Also, application of Zn significantly increased Zn concentration in shoot (36.5%) over the control. Similarly, Moshiri et al (2010) reported increase of Zn concentration in shoot with application of Zn fertilizer. Zn use efficiency in bread wheat genotype, Durum and Thriticosecale wheat was ranked as: Durum < C75-5 < Alvand < Falat < Triticale ~ Toos. The findings of Khoshgoftarmanesh et al (2004) showed that, Durum wheat is Zn inefficient genotype. According to our research results, Toos and Falat cultivars and Thriticosecale have higher efficiency than Alvand and C75-5 cultivars and Durum wheat. The results also suggest that to obtain higher yield in Durum wheat, soil and foliar application of Zn is more necessary in comparison with other genotypes especially Toos and Thriticosecale. Conclusion: wheat genotypes were different in their response to Zn deficiency and Zn supply. Thriticosecale and Toos were the most Zn efficient genotypes, whereas Durum and C75-5 were the most responding to Zn supply. So, without considering these differences, accurate fertilizer recommendation cannot be achieved. For organic farming and low input agriculture systems in regions similar to this experiment location (Torough Station), Thriticosecale and Toos could be suggested. However, for improvement of wheat grain yield and achieve desired quality in calcareous soil, most of the time, it is necessary to use the Zinc fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased grain yield by 12.61% over control.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application increased significantly grain yield by 12.61% in comparison with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2864–2952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat had the highest yield increase under zinc application at 23.5%.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yield increase due to Zn application was found in durum wheat (23.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3108–3195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toos had the lowest zinc-induced yield increase at 1.3%.

Material
Toos cultivare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.3%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest grain yield increase, were found in Toos cultivar (1.3% yield increase).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3201–3284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased grain zinc concentration by 8.6%.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
Application of Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn increased Zn concentration and uptake in grain, 8.6% and 21.5% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3379–3473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased grain zinc uptake by 21.5%.

Treatment
Application of Zne0
Outcome
uptake in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn increased Zn concentration and uptake in grain, 8.6% and 21.5% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3379–3473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application increased shoot zinc concentration by 36.5% over control.

Treatment
application of Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentration in shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Zn significantly increased Zn concentration in shoot (36.5%) over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3480–3573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc use efficiency ranked from Durum lowest to Triticale and Toos highest.

Outcome
Zn use efficiencye0
Qualifier
Durum < C75-5 < Alvand < Falat < Triticale ~ Toose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn use efficiency in bread wheat genotype, Durum and Thriticosecale wheat was ranked as: Durum < C75-5 < Alvand < Falat < Triticale ~ Toos.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3688–3827 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thriticosecale and Toos were the most Zn-efficient genotypes.

Material
Thriticosecalee0
Outcome
most Zn efficient genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thriticosecale and Toos were the most Zn efficient genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4364–4424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum and C75-5 responded most to zinc supply.

Material
Durume0
Outcome
most responding to Zn supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Durum and C75-5 were the most responding to Zn supply.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4434–4488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soil and foliar zinc for higher Durum wheat yield.

Outcome
soil and foliar application of Zne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to obtain higher yield in Durum wheat, soil and foliar application of Zn is more necessary in comparison with other genotypes especially Toos and Thriticosecale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4109–4270 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Thriticosecale and Toos for organic or low-input farming near Torough Station.

Outcome
Thriticosecale and Toos could be suggestede0
Setting
Torough Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For organic farming and low input agriculture systems in regions similar to this experiment location (Torough Station), Thriticosecale and Toos could be suggested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4587–4750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend zinc fertilizer for wheat yield and quality in calcareous soil.

Outcome
use the Zinc fertilizerse0
Qualifier
calcareous soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for improvement of wheat grain yield and achieve desired quality in calcareous soil, most of the time, it is necessary to use the Zinc fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4760–4907 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.