Paper · 2024 · IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

REDUCING THE HEAT STRESS ON MAIZE DURING SPRING SEASON BY USING SOME BIO STIMULANTS

Athraa.A .Al- Omairi; I. H. H. Al-Hilfy

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the effect of bio stimulators )chitosan and Appetizer( in reducing the heat stress on maize during spring season. Field experiment was conducted at the experimental farm, Coll. of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Baghdad, Al-Jadiriya, Iraq, during the seasons of 2020 and 2021. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Blocks Design within split plot arrangement, with three replicates. Where the main plots included two cultivars of maize )Baghdad3 and cultivar 5018(, while the sub plots included five levels of chitosan and Appetizer:(soaking seeds with Chitosan at a concentration of 100 and 500 mg L-1, and spraying with Chitosan 100 mg L-1, and spraying Appetizer in two and three stages in addition to the two control treatments, which are soaking seeds with distilled water and dry seeds. The results showed that the cultivar 5018 was superiored in grain yield 11.82 and 11.08 Mg ha-1 in both seasons. The treatment of spraying Chitosan gave the highest grain yield 13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1, spraying the Appetizer in two stages gave 13.32 and 12.54 Mg ha-1 , and spraying Appetizer in three stages gave 13.70 and 12.97 Mg ha-1 for both seasons. The interaction was significant in most of the studied traits. So we recommend the use of Chitosan spray at a concentration of 100 mg L-1 and Appetizer spray at a concentration of 1.25 ml L-1 in two or three stages to reduce the effect of heat stress on maize planted in the spring season to increase grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar 5018 was superior in grain yield of 11.82 and 11.08 Mg ha-1 in the two seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
cultivar 5018e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiorede0
Value
11.82 and 11.08 Mg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the cultivar 5018 was superiored in grain yield 11.82 and 11.08 Mg ha-1 in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying chitosan gave the highest grain yield, 13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1 in the two seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying Chitosane1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of spraying Chitosan gave the highest grain yield 13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying the Appetizer in two stages gave grain yield of 13.32 and 12.54 Mg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying the Appetizer in two stagese2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
13.32 and 12.54 Mg ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“The treatment of spraying Chitosan gave the highest grain yield 13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1, spraying the Appetizer in two stages gave 13.32 and 12.54 Mg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying the Appetizer in three stages gave grain yield of 13.70 and 12.97 Mg ha-1 in the two seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
spraying Appetizer in three stagese3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
13.70 and 12.97 Mg ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatment of spraying Chitosan gave the highest grain yield 13.26 and 12.94 Mg ha-1, spraying the Appetizer in two stages gave 13.32 and 12.54 Mg ha-1 , and spraying Appetizer in three stages gave 13.70 and 12.97 Mg ha-1 for both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1213 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar by bio stimulant interaction was significant for most of the studied traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chitosan and Appetizere5
Outcome
most of the studied traitse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e4

“The interaction was significant in most of the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1276 · show in text ↑
e5

“the effect of bio stimulators )chitosan and Appetizer(”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chitosan spray at 100 mg L-1 and Appetizer spray at 1.25 ml L-1 in two or three stages to reduce heat stress effects and increase grain yield of spring maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Chitosan spray at a concentration of 100 mg L-1 and Appetizer spray at a concentration of 1.25 ml L-1 in two or three stagese6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Setting
spring seasone6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“So we recommend the use of Chitosan spray at a concentration of 100 mg L-1 and Appetizer spray at a concentration of 1.25 ml L-1 in two or three stages to reduce the effect of heat stress on maize planted in the spring season to increase grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1527 · show in text ↑

chitosan · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.