Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Salicylic acid improves cowpea productivity under water restriction in the field by modulating metabolism

Igor Eneas Cavalcante; Alberto Soares de Melo; Rener Luciano de Souza Ferraz; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Salicylic acid has shown promise in alleviating water stress in cultivated plants. However, there is a lack of studies confirming its effectiveness in cowpea plants grown in field conditions. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the use of salicylic acid as a water stress mitigator in cowpea cultivars under different irrigation depths in field conditions. Methods Four cowpea cultivars (BRS Novaera, BRS Tapaihum, BRS Pujante, and BRS Pajeú) were subjected to different treatments: control (W100: 100% replacement of crop evapotranspiration – ETc), W50 (50% of ETc), W50+SA2 (50% of ETc + 276 mg L -1 of SA), and W50+SA4 (50% of ETc + 552 mg L -1 of SA). The treatments were combined in a 4×4 factorial scheme with three replications, arranged in a randomized block design. Results Water restriction had a negative impact on the water status, growth, gas exchange, and production of the cultivars while also leading to changes in the antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte concentration. The application of SA enhanced antioxidant activity and the synthesis of osmotic adjusters under stress conditions. The most effective concentration was 276 mg L -1 in stage R2 and 552 mg L -1 in stage V7, respectively. The BRS Pujante cultivar showed increased productivity under water restriction with SA application, while the BRS Tapaihum was the most tolerant among the cultivars studied. Discussion In summary, our findings underscore the importance of using SA to mitigate the effects of water restriction on cowpea cultivation. These discoveries are crucial for the sustainability of cowpea production in regions susceptible to drought, which can contribute to food security. We further add that the adoption of new agricultural practices can enhance the resilience and productivity of cowpea as an essential and sustainable food source for vulnerable populations in various parts of the world.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water restriction reduced the water status, growth, gas exchange and production of cowpea cultivars.

Treatment
Water restrictione0
Outcome
water status, growth, gas exchange, and productione0
Direction
negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water restriction had a negative impact on the water status, growth, gas exchange, and production of the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water restriction changed antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte concentration in cowpea.

Treatment
Water restrictione1
Outcome
antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while also leading to changes in the antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water restriction had a negative impact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid enhanced antioxidant activity and osmotic-adjuster synthesis in stressed cowpea.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
antioxidant activity and the synthesis of osmotic adjusterse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
under stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SA enhanced antioxidant activity and the synthesis of osmotic adjusters under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salicylic acid improves cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective salicylic-acid concentration at stage R2 was 276 mg L -1.

Organ / stage
stage R2e0
Treatment
Salicylic acidt0
Outcome
most effective concentratione0
Value
276 mg L -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective concentration was 276 mg L -1 in stage R2 and 552 mg L -1 in stage V7, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salicylic acid improves cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The most effective salicylic-acid concentration at stage V7 was 552 mg L -1.

Organ / stage
stage V7e0
Treatment
Salicylic acidt0
Outcome
most effective concentratione0
Value
552 mg L -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective concentration was 276 mg L -1 in stage R2 and 552 mg L -1 in stage V7, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salicylic acid improves cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Pujante had increased productivity under water restriction with salicylic acid application.

Material
BRS Pujantee0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under water restrictione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The BRS Pujante cultivar showed increased productivity under water restriction with SA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salicylic acid improves cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Tapaihum was the most tolerant cowpea cultivar studied under water restriction.

Material
BRS Tapaihume0
Outcome
most tolerante0
Direction
most tolerante0
Qualifier
under water restrictione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the BRS Tapaihum was the most tolerant among the cultivars studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Salicylic acid improves cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“under water restriction with SA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend salicylic acid to mitigate water restriction in cowpea cultivation.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
using SA to mitigate the effects of water restriction on cowpea cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our findings underscore the importance of using SA to mitigate the effects of water restriction on cowpea cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1542 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.