Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Effects of Saline–Alkali Composite Stress on the Growth and Soil Fixation Capacity of Four Herbaceous Plants

Jingjing Jian; Wenxin Su; Yule Liu; et al.

18
claims
31
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plants play a crucial role in soil fixation and enhancement of slope stability, and saline–alkaline stress is one of the main restrictions inhibiting plant growth and development. At present, there is a lack of research on the effects of saline–alkaline composite stress on the mechanical properties of the root system and the erosion resistance of the root–soil complex. In this study, three gradients of saline–alkaline composite stress treatments and a control of saline-free treatment was set up for Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens. The plant salt damage rate, osmotic index, antioxidant enzyme activity and plant root morphological indicators were measured. The biomechanical characteristics were determined by stretching tests, the resistance of the plant was measured by a whole-plant vertical uprooting test, and the anti-erosion capacity of the root soil composite was measured by scrubbing test. The results showed that, at 200 mM, the salt damage index and salt damage rate of the four plants, in descending order, were as follows: E. sphaerocephalus < L. fulgens < O. biennis < P. frutescens. Among them, SOD of Perilla frutescens did not play an obvious protective role, and the substantial changes in CAT and POD, as well as the content of soluble sugars, soluble proteins, and proline, showed its sensitivity to saline and alkaline stresses. Root growth was also significantly suppressed in all four plants, the 100- and 200-mM concentrations of saline solution significantly reduced the average tensile strength of O. biennis and P. frutescens, while the saline–alkali solution of 200 mM significantly reduced the elongation of E. sphaerocephalus and L. fulgens, and significantly elevated the soil detachment rate of the root–soil composite for E. sphaerocephalus. Additionally, all three concentrations of saline treatments significantly reduced the pullout resistance of all 4 plants. There was a negative power rate relationship between tensile resistance and root diameter in four plant species, while the relationship between tensile strength and root diameter showed a negative power law only for L. fulgens treated with 0–50 mM saline solution. There was no significant correlation between elongation and root diameter in the four plants. P. frutescens had the greatest tensile resistance and strength, as well as the lowest rate of elongation, while L. fulgens possessed the greatest pullout resistance, and both had comparable resistance to erosion of the root–soil complex. Therefore, compared to the other three plants, L. fulgens is more suitable for soil reinforcement applications on saline slopes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 mM, salt damage ranked E. sphaerocephalus lowest, then L. fulgens, O. biennis and P. frutescens.

Taxon
Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgensOenothera biennisPerilla frutescensEchinops sphaerocephalusSilene banksiae1
Treatment
200 mMe0
Outcome
salt damage index and salt damage ratee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 200 mM, the salt damage index and salt damage rate of the four plants, in descending order, were as follows: E. sphaerocephalus < L. fulgens < O. biennis < P. frutescens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD did not show an obvious protective role in P. frutescens.

Taxon
Perilla frutescensPerilla frutescense0
Gene
SODe0
Outcome
protective rolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD of Perilla frutescens did not play an obvious protective role”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in CAT and POD and soluble sugars, proteins and proline indicated P. frutescens sensitivity to saline and alkaline stress.

Taxon
Perilla frutescensPerilla frutescense1
Gene
CAT and PODe0
Outcome
sensitivity to saline and alkaline stressese0
Qualifier
content of soluble sugars, soluble proteins, and prolinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial changes in CAT and POD, as well as the content of soluble sugars, soluble proteins, and proline, showed its sensitivity to saline and alkaline stresses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“SOD of Perilla frutescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth was significantly suppressed in all four plants.

Taxon
Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgensOenothera biennisPerilla frutescensEchinops sphaerocephalusSilene banksiae1
Treatment
saline–alkaline composite stress treatmentse2
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth was also significantly suppressed in all four plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
e2

“three gradients of saline–alkaline composite stress treatments and a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline solution at 100 and 200 mM significantly reduced average tensile strength of O. biennis.

Taxon
O. biennisOenothera biennise0
Treatment
100- and 200-mM concentrations of saline solutione0
Outcome
average tensile strengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 100- and 200-mM concentrations of saline solution significantly reduced the average tensile strength of O. biennis and P. frutescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1612 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline solution at 100 and 200 mM significantly reduced average tensile strength of P. frutescens.

Taxon
P. frutescensPerilla frutescense0
Treatment
100- and 200-mM concentrations of saline solutione0
Outcome
average tensile strengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 100- and 200-mM concentrations of saline solution significantly reduced the average tensile strength of O. biennis and P. frutescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1612 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 mM, saline–alkali solution significantly reduced elongation of E. sphaerocephalus.

Taxon
E. sphaerocephalusEchinops sphaerocephaluse0
Treatment
saline–alkali solution of 200 mMe0
Outcome
elongatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the saline–alkali solution of 200 mM significantly reduced the elongation of E. sphaerocephalus and L. fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1730 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 mM, saline–alkali solution significantly reduced elongation of L. fulgens.

Taxon
L. fulgensSilene banksiae0
Treatment
saline–alkali solution of 200 mMe0
Outcome
elongatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the saline–alkali solution of 200 mM significantly reduced the elongation of E. sphaerocephalus and L. fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1730 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 mM, saline–alkali solution increased soil detachment of the E. sphaerocephalus root–soil composite.

Taxon
E. sphaerocephalusEchinops sphaerocephaluse0
Treatment
saline–alkali solution of 200 mMe0
Outcome
soil detachment rate of the root–soil compositee0
Direction
elevatede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the saline–alkali solution of 200 mM significantly reduced the elongation of E. sphaerocephalus and L. fulgens, and significantly elevated the soil detachment rate of the root–soil composite for E. sphaerocephalus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1833 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three saline concentrations reduced pullout resistance in all four plants.

Taxon
Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgensOenothera biennisPerilla frutescensEchinops sphaerocephalusSilene banksiae1
Treatment
all three concentrations of saline treatmentse0
Outcome
pullout resistancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
saline-free treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three concentrations of saline treatments significantly reduced the pullout resistance of all 4 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1955 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
e2

“a control of saline-free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–488 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tensile resistance had a negative power relation to root diameter in all four species.

Taxon
Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgensOenothera biennisPerilla frutescensEchinops sphaerocephalusSilene banksiae1
Organ / stage
root diametere0
Outcome
tensile resistancee0
Direction
negative power rate relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a negative power rate relationship between tensile resistance and root diameter in four plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2068 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tensile strength had a negative power relation to root diameter only for L. fulgens at 0–50 mM saline solution.

Taxon
L. fulgensSilene banksiae0
Organ / stage
root diametere0
Treatment
0–50 mM saline solutione0
Outcome
tensile strengthe0
Direction
negative power lawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relationship between tensile strength and root diameter showed a negative power law only for L. fulgens treated with 0–50 mM saline solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elongation and root diameter had no significant correlation across the four plants.

Taxon
Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgensOenothera biennisPerilla frutescensEchinops sphaerocephalusSilene banksiae1
Organ / stage
root diametere0
Outcome
elongatione0
Direction
no significant correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oenothera biennis
Oenothera biennis · TaxonEvelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinops sphaerocephalus
Echinops sphaerocephalus · TaxonGeorg Slickers · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant correlation between elongation and root diameter in the four plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2222–2315 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oenothera biennis, Perilla frutescens, Echinops sphaerocephalus, and Lychnis fulgens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. frutescens had the greatest tensile resistance and strength.

Taxon
P. frutescensPerilla frutescense0
Outcome
tensile resistance and strengthe0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. frutescens had the greatest tensile resistance and strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. frutescens had the lowest elongation rate.

Taxon
P. frutescensPerilla frutescense0
Outcome
rate of elongatione0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. frutescens had the greatest tensile resistance and strength, as well as the lowest rate of elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. fulgens had the greatest pullout resistance.

Taxon
L. fulgensSilene banksiae0
Outcome
pullout resistancee0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. fulgens possessed the greatest pullout resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2428–2480 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. frutescens and L. fulgens had comparable root–soil erosion resistance.

Taxon
P. frutescensPerilla frutescense0
Outcome
resistance to erosion of the root–soil complexe0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
L. fulgense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Perilla frutescens
Perilla frutescens · TaxonAlex Abair · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. frutescens had the greatest tensile resistance and strength, as well as the lowest rate of elongation, while L. fulgens possessed the greatest pullout resistance, and both had comparable resistance to erosion of the root–soil complex.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2553 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged L. fulgens more suitable than the other plants for soil reinforcement on saline slopes.

Taxon
L. fulgensSilene banksiae0
Outcome
soil reinforcement applications on saline slopese0
Comparator
the other three plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Silene banksia
Silene banksia · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to the other three plants, L. fulgens is more suitable for soil reinforcement applications on saline slopes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2565–2681 · show in text ↑

salinity · disease · Oenothera biennis (German evening primrose)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · Oenothera biennis (German evening primrose)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.