Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Ecophysiological Recovery of Micropropagated Olive Cultivars: Field Research in an Irrigated Super-High-Density Orchard

Francesco Maldera; Simone Pietro Garofalo; Salvatore Camposeo

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research focuses on the seasonal patterns of the ecophysiological recovery of four olive cultivars (Arbequina, Coratina, Frantoio, and Urano), both micropropagated and self-rooted, grown in a mature, irrigated, super high-density (SHD) orchard under Mediterranean conditions (Southern of Italy). The aim was to observe the impact of the micropropagation method on the ecophysiological responses. Ecophysiological parameters, including leaf water potential (LWP), stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and transpiration rate (E) were assessed. Self-rooted trees consistently exhibited superior gs, E, and Pn recovery compared to the micropropagated ones. ‘Arbequina’ maintained elevated levels of Pn under water-deficit conditions. ‘Coratina’ exhibited increases in gs and E after irrigation. ‘Frantoio’ demonstrated recovery capabilities, with lower LWP and higher Pn under stress. ‘Urano’ micropropagated trees achieved higher gs values in mid-summer, while self-rooted trees sustained higher Pn later in the season. This field research highlighted the important role of the propagation method in optimizing the physiological performance of olive cultivars in SHD orchards. Furthermore, it highlighted the necessity of long-term studies on the effects of propagation methods and their interactions with other farming practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-rooted olive trees recovered stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis better than micropropagated trees.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Self-rooted treese0
Outcome
gs, E, and Pn recoverye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
micropropagated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Self-rooted trees consistently exhibited superior gs, E, and Pn recovery compared to the micropropagated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbequina maintained elevated photosynthetic rate during water deficit.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Arbequina’e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
elevatede0
Qualifier
water-deficit conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Arbequina’ maintained elevated levels of Pn under water-deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coratina stomatal conductance increased after irrigation.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Coratina’e0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
gse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Coratina’ exhibited increases in gs and E after irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coratina transpiration increased after irrigation.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Coratina’e0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
Ee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Coratina’ exhibited increases in gs and E after irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frantoio had lower leaf water potential under stress.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Frantoio’e0
Outcome
LWPe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
under stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Frantoio’ demonstrated recovery capabilities, with lower LWP and higher Pn under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frantoio had higher photosynthetic rate under stress.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Frantoio’e0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Frantoio’ demonstrated recovery capabilities, with lower LWP and higher Pn under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micropropagated Urano trees reached higher stomatal conductance in mid-summer.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
‘Urano’ micropropagated treese0
Outcome
gse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
mid-summere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Urano’ micropropagated trees achieved higher gs values in mid-summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Self-rooted Urano trees sustained higher photosynthetic rate later in the season.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
self-rooted treese0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
later in the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“self-rooted trees sustained higher Pn later in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Urano’ micropropagated trees achieved higher gs values in mid-summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Olive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.