Paper · 2024 · Horticulturae

Improving the Salt Tolerance of “Old Limachino Tomato” by Using a New Salt-Tolerant Rootstock

Juan-Pablo Martínez; Raúl Fuentes; Danitza Badilla; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity is a major constraint limiting the yield of tomatoes. However, grafting strategies may help to overcome the salt toxicity of this important horticultural species if appropriate rootstocks are identified. The present study aimed to test a new rootstock, JUPAFORT1, obtained by crossing the glycophyte Solanum lycopersicum (cv. Poncho Negro) with the halophyte wild-related species Solanum chilense to improve the salinity tolerance of the Chilean tomato landrace Old Limachino Tomato (OLT). Intact OLT plants were exposed to 0, 80, or 160 mM of NaCl for 21 days at the vegetative stage and compared with self-grafted (L/L) and Limachino plants grafted on JUPAFORT1 rootstock (L/R) under a completely randomized design. JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt but did not significantly increase fresh weight under stress conditions. However, JUPAFORT1 confers to the scion an anisohydric behavior contrasting with the isohydric behavior of L and L/L plants as indicated by measurements of stomatal conductance; L/R plants were able to maintain their metabolic status despite a slight decrease in the leaf’s relative water content. JUPAFORT1 rootstock also enabled the maintenance of photosynthetic pigment concentrations in the scion in contrast to L and L/L plants, which exhibited a decrease in photosynthetic pigments under stress conditions. L/R plants encountered oxidative stress at the highest stress intensity (160 mM of NaCl) only, while L and L/L plants suffered from oxidative damage at a lower dose (80 mM of NaCl). L/R plants behaved as includer plants and did not sequester Na+ in the root system, in contrast to L and L/L, which behaved as excluder plants retaining Na+ in the root system to avoid its translocation to the shoots. The expression of genes coding for ion transporters (HKT1.1, HKT1.2, LKT1, SKOR, SOS2, and SOS3) in the root system was not modified by salinity in L/R. In contrast, their expression varied in response to salinity in L and L/L. Overall, L/R plants exhibited higher physiological stability than L/L or L plants in response to an increasing NaCl dose and did not require additional energy investment to trigger an adaptative response to salinity. This suggests that the constitutive salinity tolerance of the halophyte S. chilense was maintained in the interspecific rootstock. JUPAFORT1 issued from S. lycopersicum x S. chilense may thus improve salt-stress resilience in OLT tomatoes. Additional studies are required to identify the molecular components involved in the root-to-shoot signaling pathway in this promising material.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor without salt.

Taxon
OLTe0
Material
JUPAFORT1e0
Treatment
JUPAFORT1e0
Outcome
scion vigore0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
absence of salte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

JUPAFORT1 did not significantly increase fresh weight under salt stress.

Taxon
OLTe1
Treatment
JUPAFORT1e1
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0
Qualifier
stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but did not significantly increase fresh weight under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JUPAFORT1 scions had anisohydric behavior versus isohydric L and L/L plants.

Taxon
OLTe1
Treatment
JUPAFORT1e0
Outcome
anisohydric behaviore0
Comparator
L and L/L plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“JUPAFORT1 confers to the scion an anisohydric behavior contrasting with the isohydric behavior of L and L/L plants as indicated by measurements of stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L/R plants maintained metabolic status despite lower leaf water content.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/R plantse0
Outcome
metabolic statuse0
Direction
maintaine0
Qualifier
slight decrease in the leaf’s relative water contente0

Verbatim

e0

“L/R plants were able to maintain their metabolic status despite a slight decrease in the leaf’s relative water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JUPAFORT1 preserved scion photosynthetic pigments under stress versus L and L/L.

Taxon
OLTe1
Treatment
JUPAFORT1 rootstocke0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigment concentrationse0
Direction
maintenancee0
Qualifier
stress conditionse0
Comparator
L and L/L plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“JUPAFORT1 rootstock also enabled the maintenance of photosynthetic pigment concentrations in the scion in contrast to L and L/L plants, which exhibited a decrease in photosynthetic pigments under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L and L/L plants lost photosynthetic pigments under stress.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L and L/L plantse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
stress conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“L and L/L plants, which exhibited a decrease in photosynthetic pigments under stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L/R plants showed oxidative stress only at 160 mM NaCl.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/R plantse0
Outcome
oxidative stresse0
Qualifier
160 mM of NaCle0

Verbatim

e0

“L/R plants encountered oxidative stress at the highest stress intensity (160 mM of NaCl) only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L and L/L plants suffered oxidative damage at 80 mM NaCl.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L and L/L plantse0
Outcome
oxidative damagee0
Qualifier
80 mM of NaCle0

Verbatim

e0

“L and L/L plants suffered from oxidative damage at a lower dose (80 mM of NaCl).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L/R plants included Na+ without root sequestration.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/R plantse0
Outcome
did not sequester Na+ in the root systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“L/R plants behaved as includer plants and did not sequester Na+ in the root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1636 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L and L/L plants retained Na+ in roots as excluders.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L and L/Le0
Outcome
retaining Na+ in the root systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“L and L/L, which behaved as excluder plants retaining Na+ in the root system to avoid its translocation to the shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1771 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity did not modify root ion transporter gene expression in L/R.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/Re0
Treatment
salinitye0
Gene
HKT1.1, HKT1.2, LKT1, SKOR, SOS2, and SOS3e0
Outcome
expression of genes coding for ion transporterse0
Direction
not modifiede0

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of genes coding for ion transporters (HKT1.1, HKT1.2, LKT1, SKOR, SOS2, and SOS3) in the root system was not modified by salinity in L/R.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1924 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root ion transporter gene expression varied under salinity in L and L/L.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L and L/Le0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
expressione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“their expression varied in response to salinity in L and L/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–1999 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L/R plants had higher physiological stability as NaCl dose increased.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/R plantse0
Outcome
physiological stabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increasing NaCl dosee0
Comparator
L/L or L plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“L/R plants exhibited higher physiological stability than L/L or L plants in response to an increasing NaCl dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2009–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L/R plants did not need additional energy investment for salinity adaptation.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
L/R plantse2
Outcome
additional energy investmente0
Direction
did not requiree0

Verbatim

e0

“did not require additional energy investment to trigger an adaptative response to salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2125–2216 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
e2

“L/R plants were able to maintain their metabolic status despite a slight decrease in the leaf’s relative water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1156 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer that S. chilense salinity tolerance persisted in JUPAFORT1.

Taxon
OLTe1
Material
JUPAFORT1e1
Outcome
salinity tolerancee0
Qualifier
S. chilensee0

Verbatim

e0

“the constitutive salinity tolerance of the halophyte S. chilense was maintained in the interspecific rootstock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2236–2347 · show in text ↑
e1

“JUPAFORT1 increased OLT scion vigor in the absence of salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–785 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

JUPAFORT1 may improve OLT salt stress resilience.

Taxon
OLT tomatoese0
Material
JUPAFORT1e0
Outcome
salt-stress resiliencee0
Direction
improvee0

Verbatim

e0

“JUPAFORT1 issued from S. lycopersicum x S. chilense may thus improve salt-stress resilience in OLT tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2348–2456 · show in text ↑