Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Full and Rainfed Irrigation, Traditional and Nano NPK Fertilizers on The Productivity on Five Genotypes of Safflower (Carthamus Tinctorius L.)

Marwan Rahman Al-Jobury; Waleed Khalid Al-Juheieshy

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was carried out during the winter agricultural season of 2022 and 2023 in the village of Al-Abbasiya, which is about 12 kilometers north of the center of the city of Mosul in northern Iraq, with the aim of studying the effect of two levels of irrigation (full and Rainfed irrigation) and two levels of fertilization (Traditional and nano-NPK fertilizer) on the yield and quality of five Genotypes of safflower (Gilla, MUJ-36, MUJ-38, MUJ-7, MUJ-2). The experiment was implemented according to the split split-block system and in a randomized Complete block design (R.C.B.D.) with three replications. The results showed that there were significant differences between the two irrigation treatments in all the studied traits, as full irrigation recorded the highest average number of discs per plant, disc diameter, number of seeds per disc, weight of 1000 seeds, seed yield, percentage of oil in seeds, and oil yield. The results showed that there were significant differences between the fertilization levels, with NPK nano fertilizer giving the highest averages. The genotypes recorded significant differences among themselves, and the Gilla formula gave the highest averages. The interaction between irrigation, fertilization, and genotypes was significant in all the studied traits. The highest seed and oil yields were obtained from the interaction of full irrigation with nano-fertilizer with the Gilla formula, with an average productivity of (403.19 and 38.61 g. m 2 ) respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation gave the highest average yield components, seed yield, seed oil percentage and oil yield.

Treatment
full irrigatione0
Outcome
number of discs per plant, disc diameter, number of seeds per disce0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full irrigation recorded the highest average number of discs per plant, disc diameter, number of seeds per disc, weight of 1000 seeds, seed yield, percentage of oil in seeds, and oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano NPK fertilizer gave the highest averages among fertilizer levels.

Treatment
NPK nano fertilizere0
Outcome
highest averagese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences between the fertilization levels, with NPK nano fertilizer giving the highest averages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gilla had the highest averages among significantly different genotypes.

Material
Gillae0
Outcome
highest averagese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotypes recorded significant differences among themselves, and the Gilla formula gave the highest averages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, fertilization and genotype interacted significantly for all studied traits.

Treatment
irrigation, fertilizatione0
Outcome
all the studied traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between irrigation, fertilization, and genotypes was significant in all the studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation with nano fertilizer and Gilla produced the highest seed yield, 403.19 g. m 2.

Material
Gillae0
Treatment
full irrigation with nano-fertilizere0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
403.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed and oil yields were obtained from the interaction of full irrigation with nano-fertilizer with the Gilla formula, with an average productivity of (403.19 and 38.61 g. m 2 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation with nano fertilizer and Gilla produced the highest oil yield, 38.61 g. m 2.

Material
Gillae0
Treatment
full irrigation with nano-fertilizere0
Outcome
oil yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.61 g. m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed and oil yields were obtained from the interaction of full irrigation with nano-fertilizer with the Gilla formula, with an average productivity of (403.19 and 38.61 g. m 2 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–126 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.