Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Inoculation with Mycorrhizae, Phosphorus Levels, and Humic Acids on some Components of Wheat Yield

Marwan Khaled Idan; Mohammad Salal Oleiwi

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1) produced the greatest number of grains per spike (36.5 in number) and gained the greatest weight of 1000 grains (36.32 g). The percentage of harvest index achieved its maximum value at ha -1 . The biological yield reached its highest at 34.02%, with a quantitative optimum of 14.12 tons ha -1 . Furthermore, the application of P2 phosphate fertilizer resulted in the maximum measured weight of 1000 grains (37.50 g), the highest measured number of grains per spike (38.06 grains spike -1 ), and the highest measured grain yield (5.31 tons). The biological yield was measured at 14.75 tons ha -1 , representing the highest value. Additionally, the harvest index revealed that this yield was the highest at 36.52%. Furthermore, the introduction of humic acid H2 resulted in the weight of 1000 grains reaching 37.47 g and the number of grains per spike reaching their maximum values. Humic acid H2 produced the maximum grain yield, measuring 5.31 tons ha -1 , at a rate of 38.67 grain spikes per square hectare. The value of the biological produce reached at 14.55 tons.ha -1 , while the highest percentage in the harvest index had a 41.56% reduction in its value. The greatest value was produced by the second interaction treatment M1P2. We determined the peak value for the number of grains per surge to be 38.62, with a weight of 39.09 g for 1000 grains. Spike -1 , and it most significantly increased the grain yield by 5.50 tons.ha -1 , the biological yield by 14.99 tons.ha -1 , and the percentage by which it increased the grain yield by the most substantial quantity. The harvest index achieved a value of 36.56%. The triple interaction M1P2H2 demonstrated superior performance by achieving the highest values for grain yield (6.31 tons ha -1 ) and grain yield per spike (43.95 grains spike -1 ). Additionally, this treatment yielded the highest value for grain weight (43.95%) and number of grains per spike (43.95%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1) produced the greatest number of grains per spike (36.5) in wheat.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1)e1
Interactor
Mycorrhizaet0symbiont
Outcome
number of grains per spikee1
Direction
greateste1
Value
36.5 in numbere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculation with Mycorrhizae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1) produced the greatest number of grains per spike (36.5 in number) and gained the greatest weight of 1000 grains (36.32 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1) gave the greatest 1000-grain weight (36.32 g) in wheat.

Treatment
Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1)e1
Interactor
Mycorrhizaet0symbiont
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse1
Direction
greateste1
Value
36.32 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Inoculation with Mycorrhizae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–38 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mycorrhizal inoculation (M1) produced the greatest number of grains per spike (36.5 in number) and gained the greatest weight of 1000 grains (36.32 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the biological yield reached its highest value of 34.02%.

Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
34.02%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biological yield reached its highest at 34.02%, with a quantitative optimum of 14.12 tons ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biological yield of wheat had a quantitative optimum of 14.12 tons per hectare.

Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
optimume2
Value
14.12 tons ha -1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The biological yield reached its highest at 34.02%, with a quantitative optimum of 14.12 tons ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P2 phosphate fertilizer gave the maximum 1000-grain weight (37.50 g) in wheat.

Treatment
P2 phosphate fertilizere3
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse3
Direction
maximume3
Value
37.50 ge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“the application of P2 phosphate fertilizer resulted in the maximum measured weight of 1000 grains (37.50 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P2 phosphate fertilizer gave the highest number of grains per spike (38.06) in wheat.

Treatment
P2 phosphate fertilizere4
Outcome
number of grains per spikee4
Direction
higheste4
Value
38.06 grains spike -1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“the application of P2 phosphate fertilizer resulted in the maximum measured weight of 1000 grains (37.50 g), the highest measured number of grains per spike (38.06 grains spike -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 346–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P2 phosphate fertilizer gave the highest grain yield (5.31 tons) in wheat.

Treatment
P2 phosphate fertilizere5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
5.31 tonse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e5

“the application of P2 phosphate fertilizer resulted in the maximum measured weight of 1000 grains (37.50 g), the highest measured number of grains per spike (38.06 grains spike -1), and the highest measured grain yield (5.31 tons)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 346–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the biological yield reached its highest value of 14.75 tons per hectare.

Outcome
biological yielde6
Direction
highest valuee6
Value
14.75 tons ha -1e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e6

“The biological yield was measured at 14.75 tons ha -1, representing the highest value”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 579–665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the harvest index was highest at 36.52%.

Outcome
harvest indexe7
Direction
higheste7
Value
36.52%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e7

“the harvest index revealed that this yield was the highest at 36.52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid H2 resulted in a 1000-grain weight reaching 37.47 g in wheat.

Treatment
humic acid H2e2
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse2
Direction
reachinge2
Value
37.47 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“the introduction of humic acid H2 resulted in the weight of 1000 grains reaching 37.47 g and the number of grains per spike reaching their maximum values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid H2 resulted in the number of grains per spike reaching its maximum values in wheat.

Treatment
humic acid H2e2
Outcome
number of grains per spikee2
Direction
maximum valuese2

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“the introduction of humic acid H2 resulted in the weight of 1000 grains reaching 37.47 g and the number of grains per spike reaching their maximum values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid H2 produced the maximum grain yield (5.31 tons ha -1) in wheat.

Treatment
Humic acid H2e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
5.31 tons ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Humic acid H2 produced the maximum grain yield, measuring 5.31 tons ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the biological produce reached 14.55 tons per hectare.

Outcome
biological producee2
Value
14.55 tons.ha -1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The value of the biological produce reached at 14.55 tons.ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the highest-harvest-index treatment had a 41.56% reduction in harvest index.

Outcome
harvest indexe2
Direction
reductione2
Value
41.56%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the highest percentage in the harvest index had a 41.56% reduction in its value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the peak number of grains per spike was 38.62.

Outcome
number of grains per surgee2
Direction
peak valuee2
Value
38.62e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“We determined the peak value for the number of grains per surge to be 38.62, with a weight of 39.09 g for 1000 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the peak 1000-grain weight was 39.09 g.

Outcome
weighte2
Value
39.09 ge2
Qualifier
for 1000 grainse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“We determined the peak value for the number of grains per surge to be 38.62, with a weight of 39.09 g for 1000 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second interaction treatment M1P2 increased wheat grain yield by 5.50 tons per hectare.

Treatment
second interaction treatment M1P2e2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.50 tons.ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spike -1 , and it most significantly increased the grain yield by 5.50 tons.ha -1 , the biological yield by 14.99 tons.ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1517 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greatest value was produced by the second interaction treatment M1P2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second interaction treatment M1P2 increased wheat biological yield by 14.99 tons per hectare.

Treatment
second interaction treatment M1P2e2
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.99 tons.ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spike -1 , and it most significantly increased the grain yield by 5.50 tons.ha -1 , the biological yield by 14.99 tons.ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1517 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greatest value was produced by the second interaction treatment M1P2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, the harvest index achieved a value of 36.56%.

Outcome
harvest indexe2
Value
36.56%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The harvest index achieved a value of 36.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The triple interaction M1P2H2 gave the highest wheat grain yield (6.31 tons ha -1).

Treatment
triple interaction M1P2H2e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highest valuese2
Value
6.31 tons ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The triple interaction M1P2H2 demonstrated superior performance by achieving the highest values for grain yield (6.31 tons ha -1)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1657–1787 · show in text ↑

phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.