Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The Effect of Spraying Iron, Zinc and Copper Nanoparticles on the Components of the Crop of Two Cultivars of Bread Wheat

Salam Naji Hamagharib Rojbayany; Jasim Mohammed Aziz Aljoburi

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to find out the effect of some micro-nanomaterials by spraying on two types of bread wheat (Fayyad cultivar V1) and (Dijla Al-Khair cultivar V2 late growth) using the Randomized complete block design with three replications that included the use of micro-nanomaterial fertilizer elements (iron), (zinc) and (copper) separately and in combination with Some of them, as the Fayyad cultivar surpassed significantly in the qualification of the number of tillers on the Dijla cultivar without any significant differences between them in the qualities of the height of the plant, the weight of 1000 grains, the harvest index and the economic yield, as the Fayyad cultivar gave the highest Maen for the first three qualities, while the economic yield gave the Dijla cultivar the highest Maen for the trait without any significant differences between the two species, while the biological yield gave the Dijla cultivar the highest Maen for the trait compared to the Fayyad cultivar without any significant difference. As for the effect of fertilizer additions, the results indicated that there were significant differences between the Maens of the studied qualities (number of tillers m -2 ), (height of the plant cm), (weight of 1000 grains), (grain yield ton hectare -1 ), (biological yield) and (harvest index), as the treatment (T9) was superior, which included (iron + zinc +copper) at the expense of other additives and gave the highest values of (767.17) plant tillers -2 , (97.867) plant cm -1 , (7.891) ton hectar -1 , (23.533) ton hectar -1 respectively and that the control treatment (T1) gave the lowest values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fayyad had significantly more tillers than Dijla.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Fayyad cultivare0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Dijla cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fayyad cultivar surpassed significantly in the qualification of the number of tillers on the Dijla cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars did not differ significantly in plant height, 1000 grain weight and harvest index.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
height of the plant, the weight of 1000 grains, the harvest indexe0
Direction
without any significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without any significant differences between them in the qualities of the height of the plant, the weight of 1000 grains, the harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dijla had the highest economic yield, without a significant cultivar difference.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Dijla cultivare0
Outcome
economic yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
without any significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the economic yield gave the Dijla cultivar the highest Maen for the trait without any significant differences between the two species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dijla had the highest biological yield, without a significant difference from Fayyad.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Dijla cultivare0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Fayyad cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biological yield gave the Dijla cultivar the highest Maen for the trait compared to the Fayyad cultivar without any significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments differed significantly across studied yield components.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
significant differences between the Maens of the studied qualitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences between the Maens of the studied qualities (number of tillers m -2 ), (height of the plant cm), (weight of 1000 grains), (grain yield ton hectare -1 ), (biological yield) and (harvest index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 produced the highest tiller count, 767.17.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
iron + zinc +coppere0
Outcome
plant tillers -2e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
767.17e0
Comparator
other additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (T9) was superior, which included (iron + zinc +copper) at the expense of other additives and gave the highest values of (767.17) plant tillers -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 produced the highest plant height, 97.867.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
iron + zinc +coppere0
Outcome
plant cm -1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
97.867e0
Comparator
other additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (T9) was superior, which included (iron + zinc +copper) at the expense of other additives and gave the highest values of (767.17) plant tillers -2 , (97.867) plant cm -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1519 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 produced the highest grain yield, 7.891 ton hectar -1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
iron + zinc +coppere0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.891e0
Comparator
other additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (T9) was superior, which included (iron + zinc +copper) at the expense of other additives and gave the highest values of (767.17) plant tillers -2 , (97.867) plant cm -1 , (7.891) ton hectar -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield ton hectare -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 produced the highest biological yield, 23.533 ton hectar -1.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
iron + zinc +coppere0
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
higheste0
Value
23.533e0
Comparator
other additivese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (T9) was superior, which included (iron + zinc +copper) at the expense of other additives and gave the highest values of (767.17) plant tillers -2 , (97.867) plant cm -1 , (7.891) ton hectar -1 , (23.533) ton hectar -1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“the biological yield gave the Dijla cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–936 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control treatment had the lowest values.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
control treatment (T1)e0
Outcome
lowest valuese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control treatment (T1) gave the lowest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–120 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.