Abstract
Factors such as pollinators, pollen quality, pollinator variety, high temperatures, and nutrients affect the fruit set in sweet cherry trees. In this study, the effects of different doses of N, P, and K applied from the soil on fruit set of sweet cherry were investigated. Flower bud minerals (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, and B), fruit set ratios (FSR), and yield values were determined to compare treatments for 3 years (2015–2017). FSR (%) and yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N, 11.94–22.64 and 11.23–14.82 for P, 12.38–17.39 and 12.67–13.68 for K, respectively. N affected fruit bud N, Mg, Fe, Mn, and B concentrations, FSR and yield. Parameters other than FSR increased with increasing N doses and the highest values were obtained from the highest N treatment. FSR of the highest N dose was the same as the control treatment, but lower in the other treatments. P affected fruit bud P and Mg concentrations, FSR and yield. Fruit bud P and Mg concentrations increased as compared to the control treatment. The change in FSR and yield values could not be associated with the application dose, but showed linear changes with each other. K was effective only on FSR, the lowest values were obtained at the highest dose, while it was similar at the other doses. Fruit set ratio of sweet cherry trees under present experimental conditions could not be associated with the change in fruit bud nutrients due to N, P and K fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments had fruit set ratios ranging 14.31–21.76%.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry trees
Prunus aviumt0 - Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
- Value
- 14.31–21.76e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“FSR (%) and yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen treatments had yields ranging 11.11–14.88 kg/tree.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 11.11–14.88e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus treatments had fruit set ratios ranging 11.94–22.64%.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Pe0
- Outcome
- 11.94–22.64e0
- Value
- 11.94–22.64e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“11.94–22.64 and 11.23–14.82 for P”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus treatments had yields ranging 11.23–14.82 kg/tree.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Pe0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 11.23–14.82e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“11.23–14.82 for P”
e1“yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N, 11.94–22.64 and 11.23–14.82 for P”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium treatments had fruit set ratios ranging 12.38–17.39%.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ke0
- Outcome
- FSRe1
- Value
- 12.38–17.39e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“12.38–17.39 and 12.67–13.68 for K”
e1“FSR (%) and yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N, 11.94–22.64 and 11.23–14.82 for P, 12.38–17.39 and 12.67–13.68 for K”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium treatments had yields ranging 12.67–13.68 kg/tree.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ke0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 12.67–13.68e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“12.67–13.68 for K”
e1“FSR (%) and yield (kg/tree) values ranged between 14.31–21.76 and 11.11–14.88 for N, 11.94–22.64 and 11.23–14.82 for P, 12.38–17.39 and 12.67–13.68 for K”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen affected fruit bud N, Mg and Fe concentrations.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- fruit bud N, Mg, Fee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“N affected fruit bud N, Mg, Fe, Mn, and B concentrations, FSR and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen affected fruit bud Mn and B concentrations.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- Mn, and B concentrationse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“N affected fruit bud N, Mg, Fe, Mn, and B concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
With increasing N dose, bud nutrients and yield increased, while FSR did not follow that pattern.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- increasing N dosese0
- Outcome
- Parameters other than FSRe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“Parameters other than FSR increased with increasing N doses and the highest values were obtained from the highest N treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest N dose had the same FSR as control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- highest N dosee0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
- Direction
- samee0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“FSR of the highest N dose was the same as the control treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Other N treatments had lower FSR than control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- other treatmentse0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“FSR of the highest N dose was the same as the control treatment, but lower in the other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased fruit bud P concentration relative to control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Pe1
- Outcome
- Fruit bud Pe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“Fruit bud P and Mg concentrations increased as compared to the control treatment”
e1“P affected fruit bud P and Mg concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased fruit bud Mg concentration relative to control.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Pe1
- Outcome
- Mg concentrationse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“Fruit bud P and Mg concentrations increased as compared to the control treatment”
e1“P affected fruit bud P and Mg concentrations”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus affected FSR and yield, without a dose association; the two changed linearly together.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Pe1
- Outcome
- FSR and yield valuese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“The change in FSR and yield values could not be associated with the application dose, but showed linear changes with each other”
e1“P affected fruit bud P and Mg concentrations, FSR and yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium affected only FSR.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- Ke0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“K was effective only on FSR”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest potassium dose gave the lowest FSR.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- highest dosee0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“K was effective only on FSR, the lowest values were obtained at the highest dose”
Claim · model-written summary
FSR was similar at the other potassium doses.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviumt0
- Treatment
- other dosese0
- Outcome
- FSRe0
- Direction
- similare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sweet cherry trees”
e0“K was effective only on FSR, the lowest values were obtained at the highest dose, while it was similar at the other doses”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit set ratio could not be associated with fertilization-induced changes in bud nutrients.
- Taxon
- sweet cherry treesPrunus aviume0
- Treatment
- N, P and K fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- Fruit set ratioe0
- Qualifier
- under present experimental conditionse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruit set ratio of sweet cherry trees under present experimental conditions could not be associated with the change in fruit bud nutrients due to N, P and K fertilization”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.