Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Deepak Kumar Rawat; Chandrabhushan Verma; Amit Kumar Sharma; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and quality of chickpea during two consecutive rabi seasons of years 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three varieties in main plot viz. (V1) KGD-1168, (V2) Radhey and (V3) KWR-108 and seven micronutrient treatments in sub plots viz. (M1) Control, (M2) Zinc @ 0.5%, (M3) Boron @ 0.2%, (M4) Iron @ 0.1%, (M5) Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2%, (M6) Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1% and (M7) Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%. The results reported that the higher growth parameters viz. plant height, number of branches plant-1, fresh weight plant-1 and dry weight plant-1 were recorded with variety Radhey. However it was statistically at par with variety KWR-108 during both the experimental years. Among the micronutrients, application of M7 (Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%) recorded higher growth parameters with quality produce which were at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% and Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety Radhey recorded higher growth parameters (plant height, branches, fresh and dry weight) in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results reported that the higher growth parameters viz. plant height, number of branches plant-1, fresh weight plant-1 and dry weight plant-1 were recorded with variety Radhey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–759 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety KWR-108 was statistically at par with Radhey for growth parameters in both years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
KWR-108e2
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Qualifier
statistically at pare2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results reported that the higher growth parameters viz. plant height, number of branches plant-1, fresh weight plant-1 and dry weight plant-1 were recorded with variety Radhey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–759 · show in text ↑
e2

“However it was statistically at par with variety KWR-108 during both the experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M7 micronutrient combination (Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%) gave higher growth parameters with quality produce than the other micronutrient treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e3
Outcome
growth parameterse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
with quality producee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of M7 (Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%) recorded higher growth parameters with quality produce which were at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% and Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M7 gave growth parameters statistically at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e3
Outcome
growth parameterse3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of M7 (Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%) recorded higher growth parameters with quality produce which were at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% and Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M7 gave growth parameters statistically at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e3
Outcome
growth parameterse3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of varieties and micronutrient applications on growth and qualitative characters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of M7 (Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%) recorded higher growth parameters with quality produce which were at par with Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% and Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1075 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

boron atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.