Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of lime, sulphur and boron on the germination of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in acidic soil of Jharkhand

Surojit Kar; Ashok Kumar; Pallabi Patra; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This field investigation was carried out with the objective to study the “Effect of lime, boron and sulphur on germination of chickpea in acidic soils of Jharkhand”. The experiment was carried out during Rabi season of 2022-23 in the experimental field of Department of Agriculture, Jharkhand Rai University, Ranchi. These were eight treatments with three replications consisting of three components viz. lime (@3q/ha), boron (@1kg/ha) and sulphur (@20 kg/ha) in different combinations as basal along with the recommended dose of fertilizer (25:50:25 kg/ha). Observations were recorded on three parameters viz. germination percentage, vigour index and number of days taken in germination. RDF+ Lime @3q/ha + Sulphur@20 kg/ha+Boron@1 kg/ha recorded higher germination percentage and germination index. Then was no effect of lime, sulphur or boron on days taken in germination. Though the number of days in germination reduced due to NPK application. The maximum number of days taken for germination was observed in control plot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF, lime, sulphur and boron produced higher germination percentage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ Lime @3q/ha + Sulphur@20 kg/ha+Boron@1 kg/hae0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ Lime @3q/ha + Sulphur@20 kg/ha+Boron@1 kg/ha recorded higher germination percentage and germination index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined RDF, lime, sulphur and boron produced higher germination index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RDF+ Lime @3q/ha + Sulphur@20 kg/ha+Boron@1 kg/hae0
Outcome
germination indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDF+ Lime @3q/ha + Sulphur@20 kg/ha+Boron@1 kg/ha recorded higher germination percentage and germination index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lime did not affect days to germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
limee0
Outcome
days taken in germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Then was no effect of lime, sulphur or boron on days taken in germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sulphur did not affect days to germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
days taken in germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Then was no effect of lime, sulphur or boron on days taken in germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boron did not affect days to germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
borone0
Outcome
days taken in germinatione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Then was no effect of lime, sulphur or boron on days taken in germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK application reduced days to germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NPK applicatione0
Outcome
number of days in germinatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though the number of days in germination reduced due to NPK application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control plot had the longest time to germination.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
number of days taken for germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of days taken for germination was observed in control plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–85 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

lime · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.