Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AHL/Fe-CNF nanocomposites increased chickpea germination rate and growth.

A claim from Bacterial homoserine lactones as a nanocomposite fertilizer and defense regulator for chickpeas · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AHL/Fe-CNF nanocomposites increased chickpea germination rate and growth.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AHL/Fe-CNF nanocompositese0
Outcome
germination rate and plant growthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AHL/Fe-CNF nanocomposites were effective in increasing germination rate and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88
t0

“chickpeas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–95

Title

Bacterial homoserine lactones as a nanocomposite fertilizer and defense regulator for chickpeas

Govind Sharan Gupta; Arun Kumar; Nishith Verma Environmental Science Nano 2019. doi:10.1039/c9en00199a

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-14b652eb7bdfb54dee1fedc45342748110879dcef087b305ec3fd2db74625391 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

iron atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.