Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Growth and yield response of wheat genotypes to rain-fed and irrigated conditions

Saurav Kumar; Anjana Chauhan; Hasnain .; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study evaluates the growth and yield response of four wheat genotypes (RR 21, SY 225, PBW 550, PBW 292) under rain-fed and irrigated conditions. Conducted at Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University, Dehradun, the experiment measured plant height, dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR), and yield attributes. Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions. The highest grain yield was recorded in the PBW 550 genotype under irrigated conditions (38.70 t/ha), which also had superior test weight, stover yield, and harvest index. Rain-fed conditions resulted in lower plant height, tillering, and grain yield. The findings suggest that irrigation significantly enhances wheat growth and yield, with PBW 550 being the most suitable variety for the region. However, the interaction between growing conditions and varieties was found to be non-significant, indicating a need for further research.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved plant height relative to rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
rain-fed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved dry weight relative to rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
rain-fed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved CGR relative to rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
CGRe0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
rain-fed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved RGR relative to rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
rain-fed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation significantly improved number of tillers per plant relative to rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
irrigated conditionse0
Outcome
number of tillers per plante0
Direction
improvementse0
Comparator
rain-fed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated significant improvements in plant height, dry weight, CGR, RGR, and the number of tillers per plant under irrigated conditions compared to rain-fed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 550 under irrigation had the highest grain yield, 38.70 t/ha.

Material
PBW 550e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.70 t/hae0
Qualifier
under irrigated conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in the PBW 550 genotype under irrigated conditions (38.70 t/ha), which also had superior test weight, stover yield, and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 550 under irrigation had superior test weight.

Material
PBW 550e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in the PBW 550 genotype under irrigated conditions (38.70 t/ha), which also had superior test weight, stover yield, and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 550 under irrigation had superior stover yield.

Material
PBW 550e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in the PBW 550 genotype under irrigated conditions (38.70 t/ha), which also had superior test weight, stover yield, and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW 550 under irrigation had superior harvest index.

Material
PBW 550e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in the PBW 550 genotype under irrigated conditions (38.70 t/ha), which also had superior test weight, stover yield, and harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of growing conditions and varieties was not significant.

Outcome
interaction between growing conditions and varietiese0
Setting
growing conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between growing conditions and varieties was found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1024 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.