Paper · 2024 · Frontiers in Environmental Science

Effects of occasional tillage on soil physical and chemical properties and weed infestation in a 10-year no-till system

Massamba Diop; Adnane Beniaich; Harun Cicek; et al.

17
claims
49
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Few studies have investigated how one-time targeted tillage of long-term no-till fields impacts topsoil properties and weed dynamics. An on-farm trial was implemented in 2020 to test the effects of occasional tillage (OT) in Morocco with a long-term no-tillage (NT) system and rainfed field crops: durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ). Four treatments were established, namely, continuous NT with crop residues maintained (“NT + residue”); continuous NT with crop residues not maintained (“NT-residue”); shallow inversion tillage (“shallow OT”); and deep non-inversion tillage (“deep OT”). We assessed the effect of these treatments on soil physical and chemical properties in 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depths after crop harvest of the 2020–2021 (year 1) and 2021–2022 (year 2) growing seasons corresponding to 1 and 2 years after OT, respectively. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the treatments on weed populations and the effect of the legume crop rotated with wheat on soil nitrogen (N) and weed density. In year 1, deep OT reduced the water content at field capacity and available water capacity at 0–10 cm compared to continuous NT; the cation-exchange capacity (CEC) under deep OT was lower than in NT-residue and NT + residue at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm, respectively. Furthermore, deep OT increased ammonium-N (NH 4 -N) at 0–10 and 10–20 cm compared to NT + residue but reduced exchangeable potassium (K) at 10–20 cm depth compared to NT-residue. In year 2, shallow OT had lower total porosity at 10–20 cm than NT + residue, while shallow and deep OT recorded higher water-stable aggregates at 0–10 cm than NT + residue; at 10–20 cm, deep OT recorded lower CEC than NT + residue. However, deep OT had higher nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) and available sulfur (S) than NT-residue at 10–20 cm. Occasional tillage did not significantly affect 10 out of 19 of the soil properties evaluated, including soil organic matter (SOM), in all the years and did not help reduce the stratification of soil nutrients in NT. In year 1, 50 days after OT, deep OT reduced the weed density by 46% compared to NT + residue, while in year 2, 406 days after OT, shallow OT reduced weed density by 53% compared to NT-residue. Regarding the effect of the legume rotated with wheat, faba bean appeared to be the better preceding or following wheat crop as it resulted in higher residual soil mineral N and lower weed infestation than chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage reduced two topsoil water-capacity measures relative to continuous no till in year 1.

Organ / stage
0–10 cme0
Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
water content at field capacity and available water capacitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
continuous NTe0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 1, deep OT reduced the water content at field capacity and available water capacity at 0–10 cm compared to continuous NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage lowered cation-exchange capacity at 0–10 cm versus no till without residue in year 1.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
cation-exchange capacitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
0–10 cme0
Comparator
NT-residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cation-exchange capacity (CEC) under deep OT was lower than in NT-residue and NT + residue at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage lowered cation-exchange capacity at 10–20 cm versus no till with residue in year 1.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
cation-exchange capacitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cation-exchange capacity (CEC) under deep OT was lower than in NT-residue and NT + residue at 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage raised ammonium N at both measured depths relative to no till with residue.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
ammonium-Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0–10 and 10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep OT increased ammonium-N (NH 4 -N) at 0–10 and 10–20 cm compared to NT + residue but reduced exchangeable potassium (K) at 10–20 cm depth compared to NT-residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage reduced exchangeable potassium at 10–20 cm relative to no till without residue.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
exchangeable potassiume0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT-residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep OT increased ammonium-N (NH 4 -N) at 0–10 and 10–20 cm compared to NT + residue but reduced exchangeable potassium (K) at 10–20 cm depth compared to NT-residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow occasional tillage lowered total porosity at 10–20 cm in year 2.

Treatment
shallow OTe0
Outcome
total porositye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 2, shallow OT had lower total porosity at 10–20 cm than NT + residue, while shallow and deep OT recorded higher water-stable aggregates at 0–10 cm than NT + residue; at 10–20 cm, deep OT recorded lower CEC than NT + residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow occasional tillage raised water-stable aggregates in the topsoil in year 2.

Treatment
shallow OTe0
Outcome
water-stable aggregatese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
0–10 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 2, shallow OT had lower total porosity at 10–20 cm than NT + residue, while shallow and deep OT recorded higher water-stable aggregates at 0–10 cm than NT + residue; at 10–20 cm, deep OT recorded lower CEC than NT + residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage raised water-stable aggregates in the topsoil in year 2.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
water-stable aggregatese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
0–10 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 2, shallow OT had lower total porosity at 10–20 cm than NT + residue, while shallow and deep OT recorded higher water-stable aggregates at 0–10 cm than NT + residue; at 10–20 cm, deep OT recorded lower CEC than NT + residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage lowered cation-exchange capacity at 10–20 cm in year 2.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
CECe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 2, shallow OT had lower total porosity at 10–20 cm than NT + residue, while shallow and deep OT recorded higher water-stable aggregates at 0–10 cm than NT + residue; at 10–20 cm, deep OT recorded lower CEC than NT + residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage raised nitrate N at 10–20 cm in year 2.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
nitrate-Ne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT-residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep OT had higher nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) and available sulfur (S) than NT-residue at 10–20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage raised available sulfur at 10–20 cm in year 2.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
available sulfure0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
10–20 cme0
Comparator
NT-residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep OT had higher nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) and available sulfur (S) than NT-residue at 10–20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Occasional tillage had no significant effect on 10 of 19 soil properties, including soil organic matter.

Treatment
Occasional tillagee0
Outcome
10 out of 19 of the soil properties evaluated, including soil organic mattere0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Value
10 out of 19e0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Occasional tillage did not significantly affect 10 out of 19 of the soil properties evaluated, including soil organic matter (SOM), in all the years and did not help reduce the stratification of soil nutrients in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–2065 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Occasional tillage did not reduce nutrient stratification under no till.

Treatment
Occasional tillagee0
Outcome
stratification of soil nutrientse0
Direction
did not help reducee0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Occasional tillage did not significantly affect 10 out of 19 of the soil properties evaluated, including soil organic matter (SOM), in all the years and did not help reduce the stratification of soil nutrients in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–2065 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep occasional tillage reduced weed density by 46% after 50 days in year 1.

Treatment
deep OTe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46%e0
Qualifier
50 days after OTe0
Comparator
NT + residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 1, 50 days after OT, deep OT reduced the weed density by 46% compared to NT + residue, while in year 2, 406 days after OT, shallow OT reduced weed density by 53% compared to NT-residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2259 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow occasional tillage reduced weed density by 53% after 406 days in year 2.

Treatment
shallow OTe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
53%e0
Qualifier
406 days after OTe0
Comparator
NT-residuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In year 1, 50 days after OT, deep OT reduced the weed density by 46% compared to NT + residue, while in year 2, 406 days after OT, shallow OT reduced weed density by 53% compared to NT-residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2067–2259 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat ( Triticum durum ), faba bean ( Vicia faba minor), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–393 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean in rotation with wheat left more residual soil mineral nitrogen than chickpea.

Treatment
faba beane0
Outcome
residual soil mineral Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean appeared to be the better preceding or following wheat crop as it resulted in higher residual soil mineral N and lower weed infestation than chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2475 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean in rotation with wheat left less weed infestation than chickpea.

Treatment
faba beane0
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba bean appeared to be the better preceding or following wheat crop as it resulted in higher residual soil mineral N and lower weed infestation than chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2316–2475 · show in text ↑
t0

“10-year no-till system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.