Paper · 2014 · Romanian Agricultural Research

Effect of tillage system and previous crop on grain yield, grain quality and weed infestation of durum wheat.

Andrzej Woźniak; B. Makarski; Anna Stępniowska

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of tillage systems and previous crops on yield, grain quality and weed infestation of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivar ‘Duroflavus’. The first experimental factor (main plots) was tillage system: 1) conventional tillage (CT) – shallow ploughing and harrowing after the harvest of previous crop; 2) reduced tillage (RT) – only a cultivator after the harvest of previous crop; and 3) herbicide tillage (HT) – only Roundup 360 SL herbicide after the harvest of previous crop. The secondary experimental factor was the previous crop of durum wheat: 1) oats (Avena sativa L.); 2) durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.); and 3) pea (Pisum sativum L.). Higher grain yields of wheat were determined in the CT than in the RT and HT systems, both after pea and after oats or wheat. The analysis of variance components indicated that the grain yield was influenced to a greater extent by previous crops than by tillage systems. Grain of high quality (higher contents of protein and gluten, and higher density) originated from CT plots, compared to RT and HT plots. In terms of durum wheat grain quality, the best previous crop turned out to be pea. The CT system increased manganese (Mn) content of grain compared to RT and HT crops and copper (Cu) content compared to HT crop. Grain originating from RT crops contained more potassium and zinc than the grain from CT and HT crops, whereas grain harvested from HT was characterized by higher contents of phosphorus and calcium than the grain from CT and RT crops. On plots cultivated with the RT and HT systems, 3-fold higher weed infestation was observed than in the CT plot. Similar observations were made for weed biomass. The analysis of variance components demonstrated that weed infestation of durum wheat was affected to a greater extent by tillage systems than by previous crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was higher under conventional tillage than under reduced and herbicide tillage, after pea, oats or wheat.

Treatment
CTe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
Highere1
Comparator
RT and HT systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Higher grain yields of wheat were determined in the CT than in the RT and HT systems, both after pea and after oats or wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–829 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variance component analysis indicated that grain yield was influenced more by previous crops than by tillage systems.

Treatment
previous cropse2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Comparator
tillage systemse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The analysis of variance components indicated that the grain yield was influenced to a greater extent by previous crops than by tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain from conventional tillage plots had higher protein and gluten contents and higher density than grain from reduced and herbicide tillage plots.

Treatment
CT plotse3
Outcome
contents of protein and gluten, and higher densitye3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
RT and HT plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Grain of high quality (higher contents of protein and gluten, and higher density) originated from CT plots, compared to RT and HT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For durum wheat grain quality the best previous crop was pea.

Treatment
peae4
Outcome
grain qualitye4
Direction
beste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In terms of durum wheat grain quality, the best previous crop turned out to be pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased grain manganese content compared with reduced and herbicide tillage.

Treatment
CT systeme5
Outcome
manganese (Mn) contente5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
RT and HT cropse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The CT system increased manganese (Mn) content of grain compared to RT and HT crops and copper (Cu) content compared to HT crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased grain copper content compared with herbicide tillage.

Treatment
CT systeme6
Outcome
copper (Cu) contente6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
HT crope6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The CT system increased manganese (Mn) content of grain compared to RT and HT crops and copper (Cu) content compared to HT crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain from reduced tillage contained more potassium and zinc than grain from conventional and herbicide tillage.

Treatment
RT cropse7
Outcome
potassium and zince7
Direction
moree7
Comparator
CT and HT cropse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Grain originating from RT crops contained more potassium and zinc than the grain from CT and HT crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain from herbicide tillage had higher phosphorus and calcium contents than grain from conventional and reduced tillage.

Treatment
HTe6
Outcome
contents of phosphorus and calciume6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
CT and RT cropse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“grain harvested from HT was characterized by higher contents of phosphorus and calcium than the grain from CT and RT crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1559 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation was 3-fold higher on reduced and herbicide tillage plots than on the conventional tillage plot.

Treatment
RT and HT systemse7
Interactor
weede7weed
Outcome
weed infestatione7
Direction
highere7
Value
3-folde7
Comparator
CT plote7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“On plots cultivated with the RT and HT systems, 3-fold higher weed infestation was observed than in the CT plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed biomass showed similar results, being higher on reduced and herbicide tillage plots than on conventional tillage.

Treatment
RT and HT systemse1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Comparator
CT plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar observations were made for weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“On plots cultivated with the RT and HT systems, 3-fold higher weed infestation was observed than in the CT plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation of durum wheat was affected more by tillage systems than by previous crops.

Treatment
tillage systemse2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed infestatione2
Comparator
previous cropse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“weed infestation of durum wheat was affected to a greater extent by tillage systems than by previous crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1883 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.