Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of nutrient and weed management on growth and productivity of field pea [Pisum sativum L. var. arvense]

Jitendra Kumar; Sant Bahadur Singh; Shiv Shanker; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of different nutrient and weed management practices a field experiment, entitled “Effect of Nutrient and Weed management on growth and productivity of field pea (Pisum sativum L. var. arvense)” was conducted at the Agricultural Research Farm (Department of Agronomy), Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri (Agra) during Rabi seasons of 2021-22 and 2022-23 with the objectives, to study the effect of nutrient management on growth and productivity of field pea, to find out the suitable nutrient and weed management for field pea and to study the economic feasibility of the treatments. Experiment was laid out using two factor viz., main plot treatments (4): NM0-Control, NM1-100% RDF (20:40:20 NPK kg ha-1), NM2-75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1, NM3-75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB and sub plot treatments (5): WM0-Unweeded, WM1-Weed free, WM2-Pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DAS, WM3-Imazethapyr 10% SL @ 25 ml a.i. ha-1 as PoE at 15-20 DAS, WM5-Quizalofop ethyl 5% EC @ 75 g a.i. ha-1 as PoE at 10-15 DAS. Highest productivity of field pea have been achieved with the application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB with weed control using pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DAS and the maximum net returns was fetched when nutrient management was done by application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB and weeds were controlled with pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DAS. But, Maximum B: C ratio was fetched when nutrient management was done by application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB, (2.06, 2.27 and 2.16) and weeds were controlled by Imazethapyr 10% SL @ 25 ml a.i. ha-1 as PoE at 15-20 DAS, (2.16, 2.36 and 2.26),during first year, second year and pooled respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest field pea productivity was achieved with 75% RDF + 2 t FYM/ha + Rhizobium + PSB combined with pendimethalin plus one hand weeding at 30 DAS.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB with weed control using pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DASe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest productivity of field pea have been achieved with the application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB with weed control using pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum net returns came from 75% RDF + 2 t FYM/ha + Rhizobium + PSB with pendimethalin plus one hand weeding at 30 DAS.

Treatment
75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB and weeds were controlled with pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DASe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum net returns was fetched when nutrient management was done by application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB and weeds were controlled with pendimethalin 30% EC @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 as PE + 1 Hand weeding at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum B:C ratio (2.16, 2.36 and 2.26 in year 1, year 2 and pooled) came from 75% RDF + 2 t FYM/ha + Rhizobium + PSB with imazethapyr at 15-20 DAS.

Treatment
75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2.16, 2.36 and 2.26e0
Qualifier
weeds were controlled by Imazethapyr 10% SL @ 25 ml a.i. ha-1 as PoE at 15-20 DASe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum B: C ratio was fetched when nutrient management was done by application of 75% RDF + 2 t FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB, (2.06, 2.27 and 2.16) and weeds were controlled by Imazethapyr 10% SL @ 25 ml a.i. ha-1 as PoE at 15-20 DAS, (2.16, 2.36 and 2.26),during first year, second year and pooled respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1841 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

62 papers: 45 positive, 17 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.