Paper · 2024 · Heliyon

Determination of the rate and frequency of Natura 250 EW fungicide for the management of cedar rust from Gesho (Rhamnus prinoides) in the north west Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Gebremariam Asaye Emrie; Kindu Demissie Fikadu

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Rhamnus prinoides (Gesho) is grown in the homesteads of farmers in western Amhara. The leaves, twigs, and stems of Gesho are indispensable ingredients in traditional beverages. Its production has recently suffered from cedar rust caused by the fungus Gymnosporangium. To manage this disease, different fungicides have been recommended. Therefore, this research was designed to determine the rate and frequency of the use of the Natura 250 EW system for managing this disease in Gesho during 2020. Five application rates of Natura 250 EW and three spray frequencies were used as treatments to manage the disease in infected Gesho plants via the Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). Statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were found between treatments for most parameters. Among these 0.75 litter ha-1 treatments, two spray applications resulted in the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy, followed by three spray applications of 0.50 litter ha−1 at Bahir Dar Zuria district. However, at Yilmana Densa district, the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy were found for the 0.75 litter ha−1 spray, followed by the 0.50 litter ha−1 spray, compared with the other treatments. Even though 0.75 litter ha−1 had greater relative efficacy and lower disease severity than the other treatments, there was no statistically significant difference between the three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1 at both locations. Therefore, three sprays of Natura 250 EW at 0.50 litter ha−1 in 15-day intervals should be recommended and demonstrated for the management of cedar rust disease on Gesho.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments differed significantly for most measured parameters.

Taxon
Rhamnus prinoidesRhamnus prinoidest0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
most parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus prinoides
Rhamnus prinoides · TaxonSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were found between treatments for most parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus prinoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of 0.75 litter ha-1 gave the lowest cedar rust severity at Bahir Dar Zuria.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha-1 treatments, two spray applicationse0
Interactor
GymnosporangiumGymnosporangiume1pathogen
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
three spray applications of 0.50 litter ha−1e0
Setting
Bahir Dar Zuria districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gymnosporangium
Gymnosporangium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLukas from London, England · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among these 0.75 litter ha-1 treatments, two spray applications resulted in the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy, followed by three spray applications of 0.50 litter ha−1 at Bahir Dar Zuria district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“cedar rust caused by the fungus Gymnosporangium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of 0.75 litter ha-1 gave the greatest relative efficacy at Bahir Dar Zuria.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha-1 treatments, two spray applicationse0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
three spray applications of 0.50 litter ha−1e0
Setting
Bahir Dar Zuria districte0

Verbatim

e0

“Among these 0.75 litter ha-1 treatments, two spray applications resulted in the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy, followed by three spray applications of 0.50 litter ha−1 at Bahir Dar Zuria district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Yilmana Densa, the 0.75 litter ha−1 spray had the lowest cedar rust severity.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha−1 spraye0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
0.50 litter ha−1 spraye0
Setting
Yilmana Densa districte0

Verbatim

e0

“However, at Yilmana Densa district, the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy were found for the 0.75 litter ha−1 spray, followed by the 0.50 litter ha−1 spray, compared with the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Yilmana Densa, the 0.75 litter ha−1 spray had the greatest relative efficacy.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha−1 spraye0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
0.50 litter ha−1 spraye0
Setting
Yilmana Densa districte0

Verbatim

e0

“However, at Yilmana Densa district, the lowest severity and greatest relative efficacy were found for the 0.75 litter ha−1 spray, followed by the 0.50 litter ha−1 spray, compared with the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficacy difference between 0.75 litter ha−1 and three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1 was not statistically significant at both locations.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha−1e0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
both locationse0
Comparator
three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Even though 0.75 litter ha−1 had greater relative efficacy and lower disease severity than the other treatments, there was no statistically significant difference between the three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1 at both locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The severity difference between 0.75 litter ha−1 and three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1 was not statistically significant at both locations.

Taxon
Geshot0
Treatment
0.75 litter ha−1e0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
both locationse0
Comparator
three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Even though 0.75 litter ha−1 had greater relative efficacy and lower disease severity than the other treatments, there was no statistically significant difference between the three sprays of 0.50 litter ha−1 at both locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gesho”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend three Natura 250 EW sprays at 0.50 litter ha−1 spaced 15 days apart to manage cedar rust on Gesho.

Taxon
Geshoe0
Interactor
cedar rust diseasee0pathogen
Outcome
three sprays of Natura 250 EW at 0.50 litter ha−1 in 15-day intervalse0

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, three sprays of Natura 250 EW at 0.50 litter ha−1 in 15-day intervals should be recommended and demonstrated for the management of cedar rust disease on Gesho.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1611 · show in text ↑