Paper · 2024 · Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Effects of Integrated Application of Vermicompost and Inorganic Fertilizers on Selected Soil Characteristics and Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) in Dire and Legedadi Watersheds of Ethiopia

Meseret Habtamu; Eyasu Elias; Teshome Soromessa; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The adoption of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) practices can improve soil quality and sustainably increase crop yield while slowing down the rate of ongoing degradation. This research assessed the effects of selected ISFM practices on soil properties at the Dire and Legedadi watersheds, central highlands of Ethiopia, in the 2021 and 2022 cropping seasons. Eight treatments were selected (sole wheat, sole faba bean, 100% recommended NPS + urea fertilizers, 100% recommended vermicompost (VC), wheat with half dose both NPS + urea and VC, wheat and faba bean intercropping with half dose both NPS + urea and VC, wheat and faba bean intercropping with half‐dose NPS + urea fertilizers, and wheat and faba bean intercropping with 50% VC). The treatments were studied on farmers’ fields using a randomized complete block design with three replications. Analysis of variance showed that soil samples collected from each plot indicated significant differences in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (Pav), exchangeable bases (Ca 2+ , Na + , and Kexc), and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Soil pH and moisture showed improvement in combined fertilizers application compared to the preplanting soil sample. A combined application of VC and NPS + urea fertilizers significantly ( p < 0.05) increased SOC, Pav, K + , Na + , and CEC compared to the control. A combined application of VC and NPS + urea fertilizers improved the soil quality. The highest TN contents of 0.36% at the Dire site and 0.30% at the Legedadi site were obtained with the full dose VC treatment. Additionally, this treatment resulted in the greatest water‐holding capacity and soil carbon stock at both sites. Similarly, the wheat‐faba bean intercropped plots showed a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on the soil carbon stock and sequestration over the control in both study sites. Based on the results of the current study, it can be concluded that the combined application of a half dose of each VC and NPS + urea fertilizers improved most soil physicochemical properties at both sites. This suggests that using a combination of VC and NPS + urea fertilizers can help farmers reduce their inorganic fertilizer needs by 50%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments produced significant differences in SOC, TN, Pav, exchangeable bases and CEC.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (Pav)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (Pav), exchangeable bases (Ca 2+ , Na + , and Kexc), and cation exchange capacity (CEC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer application improved soil pH and moisture relative to preplanting soil.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined fertilizers applicatione0
Outcome
Soil pH and moisturee0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
preplanting soil samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH and moisture showed improvement in combined fertilizers application compared to the preplanting soil sample.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined VC and NPS plus urea increased SOC, Pav, K +, Na + and CEC relative to control.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined application of VC and NPS + urea fertilizerse0
Outcome
SOC, Pav, K + , Na + , and CECe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combined application of VC and NPS + urea fertilizers significantly ( p < 0.05) increased SOC, Pav, K + , Na + , and CEC compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose VC yielded the highest total nitrogen at Dire, 0.36%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
full dose VC treatmente0
Outcome
TN contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.36%e0
Setting
Dire sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest TN contents of 0.36% at the Dire site and 0.30% at the Legedadi site were obtained with the full dose VC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose VC yielded the highest total nitrogen at Legedadi, 0.30%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
full dose VC treatmente0
Outcome
TN contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.30%e0
Setting
Legedadi sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest TN contents of 0.36% at the Dire site and 0.30% at the Legedadi site were obtained with the full dose VC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose VC gave the greatest water-holding capacity and soil carbon stock at both sites.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
full dose VC treatmente1
Outcome
water‐holding capacity and soil carbon stocke0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment resulted in the greatest water‐holding capacity and soil carbon stock at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1719 · show in text ↑
e1

“full dose VC treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat–faba bean intercropping significantly affected soil carbon stock and sequestration relative to control at both sites.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
wheat‐faba bean intercropped plotse0
Outcome
soil carbon stock and sequestratione0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat‐faba bean intercropped plots showed a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on the soil carbon stock and sequestration over the control in both study sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half doses of both VC and NPS plus urea improved most soil physicochemical properties at both sites.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
combined application of a half dose of each VC and NPS + urea fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil physicochemical propertiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of a half dose of each VC and NPS + urea fertilizers improved most soil physicochemical properties at both sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combined VC and NPS plus urea could reduce inorganic fertilizer requirements by 50%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)Vicia fabaTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
reduce their inorganic fertilizer needse0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using a combination of VC and NPS + urea fertilizers can help farmers reduce their inorganic fertilizer needs by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2117–2233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–187 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.