Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Unravelling wheat genotypic responses: insights into salinity stress tolerance in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant mechanisms, osmolyte accumulation and grain quality parameters

Neha Patwa; Vanita Pandey; Om Prakash Gupta; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salt stress is a prominent abiotic stressor that imposes constraints on grain yield and quality across various crops, including wheat (Triticum aestivum). This study focused on assessing the genetic diversity of 20 wheat genotypes categorized as tolerant, moderately tolerant, and sensitive with three genotypes of unknown tolerance. To address salinity stress-related problems, different morpho-physiological, osmoprotectant, biochemical, yield, and grain quality-related parameters were analyzed under control (pH 8.0, EC 3.9) and saline-sodic (pH 9.4, EC 4.02) conditions in field. RESULTS: content were observed in response to salt stress in the sensitive varieties HD1941 and K9162. Proline, a stress indicator, exhibited significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater accumulation in response to salinity stress, particularly in the tolerant cultivars KRL210 and KH65. Salt stress induced the most significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in spike length, thousand-grain weight, and hectolitre weight coupled with increased protein content in sensitive varieties, resulting in diminished yield. CONCLUSION: contents can be used as the most efficient screening criteria for salinity stress during early developmental stages. Principal component analysis revealed that DBW187, DBW303, and DBW222 varieties were tolerant to salinity stress and exhibited an effective antioxidant system against salinity. This study will facilitate salt-tolerant wheat breeding in terms of the identification of tolerant lines by screening for limited traits in a wide range of germplasms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulated more under salinity, especially in tolerant KRL210 and KH65.

Material
KRL210 and KH65e0
Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
greater accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline, a stress indicator, exhibited significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater accumulation in response to salinity stress, particularly in the tolerant cultivars KRL210 and KH65.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress decreased spike length, thousand-grain weight and hectolitre weight in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
spike length, thousand-grain weight, and hectolitre weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress induced the most significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in spike length, thousand-grain weight, and hectolitre weight coupled with increased protein content in sensitive varieties, resulting in diminished yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased protein content in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress induced the most significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in spike length, thousand-grain weight, and hectolitre weight coupled with increased protein content in sensitive varieties, resulting in diminished yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress diminished yield in sensitive varieties.

Material
sensitive varietiese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress induced the most significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in spike length, thousand-grain weight, and hectolitre weight coupled with increased protein content in sensitive varieties, resulting in diminished yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component analysis classified DBW187, DBW303 and DBW222 as salinity tolerant with effective antioxidant systems.

Material
DBW187, DBW303, and DBW222e0
Outcome
tolerant to salinity stress and exhibited an effective antioxidant systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis revealed that DBW187, DBW303, and DBW222 varieties were tolerant to salinity stress and exhibited an effective antioxidant system against salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1395 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–165 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

salinity · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.