Paper · 2024 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Soybean production in SEALBA: inoculation, co-inoculation, and starter nitrogen fertilization

Antonio Dias Santiago; Sergio de Oliveira Procópio; Marcelo Ferreira Fernandes; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The grain production area in the Brazilian agricultural region known as SEALBA, especially in Alagoas State, has seen significant growth in recent years. This study aims to contribute to sustainable regional development by evaluating the effects of inoculation, co-inoculation, and the application of starter mineral nitrogen (N), either individually or in combination, on soybean growth and yield. Eight field experiments were conducted from 2018 to 2021 in two municipalities within Alagoas, covering soybean cultivation areas ranging from the first to the fourth year. The experiments followed a randomized complete block design with four replications, employing a factorial arrangement of treatments. The first factor encompassed five levels related to inoculation technologies and N management: 1) Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium; 2) Inoculation with Bradyrhizobium combined with N basal fertilization; 3) Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum; 4) Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium + Azospirillum + N fertilization at the base; and 5) Control treatment without microbiological inputs or nitrogen fertilizers. The second factor involved the evaluation of different soybean cultivars, with two materials assessed in 2018 and three cultivars in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Results demonstrated that seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium led to increased soybean grain yield in first-year cultivation areas. However, N basal fertilization, commonly known as starter fertilization, did not result in yield improvements compared to the use of microbiological inputs alone. Soybean cultivars BRS 9383 IPRO and FTR 3191 IPRO exhibited greater responsiveness to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bradyrhizobium seed inoculation increased soybean grain yield in first-year cultivation areas.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
soybean grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
first-year cultivation arease0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrated that seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium led to increased soybean grain yield in first-year cultivation areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter N fertilization did not improve soybean yield relative to microbiological inputs alone.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
N basal fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not result in yield improvementse0
Comparator
microbiological inputs alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N basal fertilization, commonly known as starter fertilization, did not result in yield improvements compared to the use of microbiological inputs alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS 9383 IPRO showed greater responsiveness to Bradyrhizobium seed inoculation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
BRS 9383 IPROe0
Treatment
seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
responsiveness to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean cultivars BRS 9383 IPRO and FTR 3191 IPRO exhibited greater responsiveness to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1697 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FTR 3191 IPRO showed greater responsiveness to Bradyrhizobium seed inoculation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Material
FTR 3191 IPROe0
Treatment
seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
responsiveness to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobiume0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean cultivars BRS 9383 IPRO and FTR 3191 IPRO exhibited greater responsiveness to seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1697 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.