Abstract
Although chemical fertilization has gained a lot of attention due to its ability to increase the yield of fruit trees, it has been known to cause numerous environmental problems such as soil deterioration, alleviating beneficial microorganisms, and reducing fruit quality and safety. Hence, today, we aim to reduce these problems by using eco-friendly and sustainable biostimulants to promote nutritional status, yield, and quality. The effect of wood vinegar (WV) on mango production has yet to be investigated. Therefore, a field trial was conducted during the 2023 and 2024 seasons to evaluate the regulatory effect of individual and combined application of wood vinegar (WV), seaweed extract (SW), and humic acid (HA) on the performance of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Ewais. The results revealed that all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control. Based on this study, the treatment of 2 L/ha seaweed + 2 L/ha humic acid + 2 L/ha wood vinegar combined had the greatest effect on enhancing Ewais mango fruit yield by up-regulating leaf mineral acquisition, antioxidant response, and sugar accumulation. This study supports the application of HA and SW in combination with WV to improve mango fruit yield and quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments improved mango total chlorophyll content relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 107.7 and 106.6%.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- total chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 107.7 and 106.6%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments improved mango leaf N relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 2.02 and 2.23%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- leaf Ne0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 2.02 and 2.23%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments improved mango P relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 0.38 and 0.4.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 0.38 and 0.4e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments improved mango K relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 1.07 and 1.13%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 1.07 and 1.13%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments increasing mango fruit length relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 11.68 and 12.38 cm.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit lengthe0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 11.68 and 12.38 cme0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments increasing mango fruit width relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 7.8 and 8.59 cm.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit widthe0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 7.8 and 8.59 cme0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments increasing mango total sugars relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 40 and 37.3%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- total sugarse0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 40 and 37.3%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments increasing mango TSS relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 21.9 and 20.8%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 21.9 and 20.8%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biostimulant treatments reducing mango total acidity relative to control; reported 2023 and 2024 values were 64.3 and 69.0%.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- total aciditye0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Value
- 64.3 and 69.0%e0
- Qualifier
- 2023 and 2024 seasonse0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all treatments had a pronounced effect and significantly improved the total chlorophyll content (107.7 and 106.6%), leaf N (2.02 and 2.23%), P (0.38 and 0.4), and K (1.07 and 1.13%), as well as enhancing the quality of mango fruits by increasing fruit length (11.68 and 12.38 cm), fruit width (7.8 and 8.59 cm), total sugars (40 and 37.3%), and TSS (21.9 and 20.8%) while reducing the total acidity (64.3 and 69.0%) in the 2023 and 2024 seasons, respectively, compared with the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined seaweed, humic acid and wood vinegar treatment had the greatest effect on Ewais mango fruit yield.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Material
- Ewaise0
- Treatment
- 2 L/ha seaweed + 2 L/ha humic acid + 2 L/ha wood vinegare0
- Outcome
- mango fruit yielde0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of 2 L/ha seaweed + 2 L/ha humic acid + 2 L/ha wood vinegar combined had the greatest effect on enhancing Ewais mango fruit yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment enhanced yield through leaf mineral acquisition, antioxidant response and sugar accumulation, according to the authors.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Outcome
- mango fruit yielde0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
- Qualifier
- up-regulating leaf mineral acquisition, antioxidant response, and sugar accumulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“enhancing Ewais mango fruit yield by up-regulating leaf mineral acquisition, antioxidant response, and sugar accumulation”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors support combined HA, SW and WV application to improve mango fruit yield and quality.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- HA and SW in combination with WVe0
- Outcome
- mango fruit yield and qualitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study supports the application of HA and SW in combination with WV to improve mango fruit yield and quality”
The same questions in other papers
other · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.