Paper · 2024 · Acta Horticulturae

Optimizing the consumptive irrigation water use in a young drip-irrigated almond orchard

F. Montoya; J.M. Sánchez; J. González-Piqueras; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In arid and semiarid Mediterranean agro-ecosystems, where the surface area of almonds grown under irrigation is increasing each year, technicians and growers demand operative tools and practices which aid in using limited irrigation water resources more efficiently. A field experiment was carried out during two growing seasons in southeast Spain to assess the crop growth, the crop water requirements, and the productive response of young almond trees irrigated using both surface (DI) and subsurface (SDI) drip-irrigation systems. In this experiment we used the FAO56 methodology to determine the irrigation scheduling. Several crop growth samples, crop water status samples, and soil moisture measurements were collected during both cropping seasons. In addition, each treatment had two towers equipped with a set of thermal infrared broad-band radiometers to measure both soil and canopy temperatures which allowed us to estimate the crop evapotranspiration (ETc), tree transpiration (Tc), and soil evaporation (Es), using a simplified version of the Two Source Energy Balance (STSEB) approach. SDI resulted in water savings of around 12% in comparison with the SDI, and there were not significant differences on yield, tree growth and tree water status between the two irrigation systems. The midday stem water potential (Ψstem) was related with the measured soil water content, showing us that a depletion of up to 45-50% of the total available water would maintain good water status (Ψstem≥-1.0 MPa) in almond trees. These encouraging results suggest that SDI is a suitable alternative for reducing the non-productive water use resulting in water savings and maintaining the crop yield in almond orchards.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation saved around 12% water compared with surface drip irrigation in young almond trees.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise6
Treatment
subsurface (SDI) drip-irrigation systemse1
Outcome
water savingse0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
surface (DI)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDI resulted in water savings of around 12% in comparison with the SDI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“surface (DI) and subsurface (SDI) drip-irrigation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–532 · show in text ↑
e6

“the productive response of young almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface and surface drip irrigation gave no significant difference in yield, tree growth or tree water status in young almond trees.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise6
Treatment
subsurface (SDI) drip-irrigation systemse1
Outcome
yield, tree growth and tree water statuse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
surface (DI)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“surface (DI) and subsurface (SDI) drip-irrigation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–532 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were not significant differences on yield, tree growth and tree water status between the two irrigation systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1293 · show in text ↑
e6

“the productive response of young almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–453 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In young almond trees, midday stem water potential was related to measured soil water content.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise6
Treatment
measured soil water contente3
Outcome
midday stem water potentiale3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The midday stem water potential (Ψstem) was related with the measured soil water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1383 · show in text ↑
e6

“the productive response of young almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–453 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Almond trees keep good water status if soil water depletion stays at up to 45-50% of total available water.

Taxon
almond treesPrunus dulcise4
Outcome
a depletion of up to 45-50% of the total available watere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“a depletion of up to 45-50% of the total available water would maintain good water status (Ψstem≥-1.0 MPa) in almond trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1523 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation is recommended as a suitable alternative for reducing non-productive water use while maintaining almond yield.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise5
Outcome
reducing the non-productive water usee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“SDI is a suitable alternative for reducing the non-productive water use resulting in water savings and maintaining the crop yield in almond orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1712 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.