Abstract
A field experiment entitled “Effect of Nano DAP on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.)” was carried out at ARS, Dhadesugur during Kharif-2023. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with eight treatments and was replicated thrice. According to the findings, treatment T8 (100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages) recorded significantly higher growth parameters viz., plant height, number of tillers per plant, total dry matter production plant-1 and yield parameters viz., number of ear heads per hill, 1000 grains weight, grain yield (4116.6 kg ha-1), straw yield (4600.4 kg ha-1) and harvest index which were on par with treatments T7 (100% RDF only) and T6 (75% RD of N and P + 100 % RDK + Foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages) and lowest values were obtained in treatment T1 (Absolute control). This approach not only maximizes crop productivity but also proves to be economically feasible by generating higher net returns for farmers. Based on the results it can be concluded that foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages along with RDF application can produce higher crop yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave significantly higher plant height, tiller count and dry matter than control, on par with T7 and T6.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanat0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stagese0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of tillers per plant, total dry matter production plant-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Absolute controlt1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T8 (100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages) recorded significantly higher growth parameters viz., plant height, number of tillers per plant, total dry matter production plant-1”
t0“finger millet”
t1“T1 (Absolute control)”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 gave higher ear heads per hill, thousand grain weight and harvest index.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stagest1
- Outcome
- number of ear heads per hill, 1000 grains weighte0
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- Absolute controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield parameters viz., number of ear heads per hill, 1000 grains weight, grain yield (4116.6 kg ha-1), straw yield (4600.4 kg ha-1) and harvest index”
t0“finger millet”
t1“100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages”
e1“Absolute control”
e2“recorded significantly higher growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 grain yield was 4116.6 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stagest1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 4116.6 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- Absolute controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (4116.6 kg ha-1)”
t0“finger millet”
t1“100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages”
e1“Absolute control”
e2“recorded significantly higher growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 straw yield was 4600.4 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stagest1
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 4600.4 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- Absolute controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“straw yield (4600.4 kg ha-1)”
t0“finger millet”
t1“100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages”
e1“Absolute control”
e2“recorded significantly higher growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
T8 results were on par with T7 and T6.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Outcome
- on pare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on par with treatments T7 (100% RDF only) and T6 (75% RD of N and P + 100 % RDK + Foliar spray of nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages)”
t0“finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment generated higher net returns.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Nano DAPt1
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economically feasible by generating higher net returns for farmers”
t0“finger millet”
t1“Nano DAP”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend Nano DAP at tillering and booting alongside RDF for higher yield.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Outcome
- foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages along with RDF applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages along with RDF application can produce higher crop yield”
t0“finger millet”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →tillage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
55 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
52 papers more in this group
See all 56 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.