Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T8 gave significantly higher plant height, tiller count and dry matter than control, on par with T7 and T6.

A claim from Effect of nano DAP on growth and yield of finger millet · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 gave significantly higher plant height, tiller count and dry matter than control, on par with T7 and T6.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stagese0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers per plant, total dry matter production plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Absolute controlt1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T8 (100% RDF + Foliar spray of Nano DAP @ 4 ml L-1 each at tillering and booting stages) recorded significantly higher growth parameters viz., plant height, number of tillers per plant, total dry matter production plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–535
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55
t1

“T1 (Absolute control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–923

Title

Effect of nano DAP on growth and yield of finger millet

Nandeesh MU; Ashok Kumar Gaddi; Veeresh H; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i10g.1823

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-933e178fa1819b5868441e6eae65d24407ab6e176dc375a30e3baef715b26875 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    NP (67.2 kg N/ha) gave finger millet grain yields similar to NPK application (11.4 and 10.5 q/ha).

    Additive effect of fertilizer applications on rainfed finger millet. · 1975 · compared with NPK (67.2kg N, 44.4kg each of P and K/ha) application

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

tillage · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.