Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Improving Yield and Quality of ‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees by Using Shading Techniques and Reflective Materials in Response to Climate Change Under Flood Irrigation Conditions

Hesham M. A. El-Zawily; Mohammed M. S. Abo El-Enin; Hayam M. Elmenofy; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Considering climate change predictions, it is logical to anticipate detrimental effects on the mandarin tree, an essential citrus crop. Therefore, scientists should promptly focus on developing methods to enhance its resistance to climatic stress effects such as sunscald. This study assesses the strategies employed in ‘Balady’ mandarin trees when covered by shading nets of varying colors and percentages (white 50%, green 50% or 63%, black 50% or 63%), as well as the application of reflective materials (kaolin at 4% and CaCO3 at 3%) on the micro-climate of orchards, leaf, and fruit surface temperatures, fruit sunburn%, productivity, and fruit quality. The results indicated that shade nets effectively reduced temperature and enhanced humidity, especially during the period from June to September, when compared to open-field treatments. Black shade nets, particularly those with a shading level of 63%, demonstrated the most notable decrease in canopy temperature and an elevation in humidity, surpassing the performance of green and white shade nets. The present study found that shade nets and reflecting materials like kaolin and calcium carbonate significantly reduced fruit sunburn. Trees without shade had a sunburn rate of 8.74%, while those with shade treatments suffered no sunburn. Kaolin foliar spray at a concentration of 4% and calcium carbonate at a concentration of 3% reduced sunburn incidence to 3.64% and 7.32%, respectively. These treatments also reduced the intensity of sunburn. All treatments increased fruit yield % compared to the control and yield efficiency (kg/m2), especially the trees covered with white shade net of a 50% shading rate provided the highest values (43.70 and 40.17%) and (5.24 and 5.47 kg/m2) compared to other treatments in both seasons, respectively. Trees covered with a white shade net of a 50% shading rate, followed by a green shade net of 50% and a 63% shading rate, as well as a black shade net of 50% and a 63% shading rate, tended to improve the physical and chemical fruit properties. Therefore, it could be recommended that trees be covered with a white shade net of a 50% shading rate or a green shade net of a 50 and 63% shading rate in summer months due to its beneficial impact on mitigating fruit sunburn damage and enhancing the productivity and quality of ‘‘Balady’’ mandarin trees. Hence, shade nets can be a beneficial technology to protect citrus fruits from sunburn without affecting fruit quality in commercial citrus farms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade nets reduced orchard temperature relative to open field.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
shade netse0
Outcome
temperaturee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
open-field treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“shade nets effectively reduced temperature and enhanced humidity, especially during the period from June to September, when compared to open-field treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade nets enhanced humidity relative to open field.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
shade netse0
Outcome
humiditye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
open-field treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“shade nets effectively reduced temperature and enhanced humidity, especially during the period from June to September, when compared to open-field treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black 63% shade nets produced the greatest decrease in canopy temperature.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
Black shade netse0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
63%e0
Comparator
green and white shade netse0

Verbatim

e0

“Black shade nets, particularly those with a shading level of 63%, demonstrated the most notable decrease in canopy temperature and an elevation in humidity, surpassing the performance of green and white shade nets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black 63% shade nets raised canopy humidity above green and white nets.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
Black shade netse0
Outcome
humiditye0
Direction
elevatione0
Qualifier
63%e0
Comparator
green and white shade netse0

Verbatim

e0

“Black shade nets, particularly those with a shading level of 63%, demonstrated the most notable decrease in canopy temperature and an elevation in humidity, surpassing the performance of green and white shade nets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Balady’ Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade treatments eliminated fruit sunburn, versus 8.74% without shade.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
shade treatmentse0
Outcome
sunburne0
Direction
no sunburne0
Qualifier
8.74%e0
Comparator
without shadee0

Verbatim

e0

“Trees without shade had a sunburn rate of 8.74%, while those with shade treatments suffered no sunburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kaolin foliar spray at 4% reduced sunburn incidence to 3.64%.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
Kaolin foliar spray at a concentration of 4%e0
Outcome
sunburn incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Kaolin foliar spray at a concentration of 4% and calcium carbonate at a concentration of 3% reduced sunburn incidence to 3.64% and 7.32%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium carbonate at 3% reduced sunburn incidence to 7.32%.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
calcium carbonate at a concentration of 3%e0
Outcome
sunburn incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Kaolin foliar spray at a concentration of 4% and calcium carbonate at a concentration of 3% reduced sunburn incidence to 3.64% and 7.32%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade and reflective treatments reduced sunburn intensity.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
shade nets and reflecting materials like kaolin and calcium carbonatee1
Outcome
intensity of sunburne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also reduced the intensity of sunburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“shade nets and reflecting materials like kaolin and calcium carbonate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased fruit yield relative to control.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit yield %e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments increased fruit yield % compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White 50% shade produced the highest fruit yield increases of 43.70% and 40.17% across seasons.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
white shade net of a 50% shading ratee0
Outcome
highest valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
43.70 and 40.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“white shade net of a 50% shading rate provided the highest values (43.70 and 40.17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White 50% shade produced yield efficiency of 5.24 and 5.47 kg/m2 across seasons.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
white shade net of a 50% shading ratee0
Outcome
yield efficiencye1
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.24 and 5.47 kg/m2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“white shade net of a 50% shading rate provided the highest values (43.70 and 40.17%) and (5.24 and 5.47 kg/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1745 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield efficiency (kg/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White and green and black shade nets tended to improve physical and chemical fruit properties.

Taxon
Mandarint0
Treatment
white shade net of a 50% shading ratee0
Outcome
physical and chemical fruit propertiese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trees covered with a white shade net of a 50% shading rate, followed by a green shade net of 50% and a 63% shading rate, as well as a black shade net of 50% and a 63% shading rate, tended to improve the physical and chemical fruit properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–2047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mandarin Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend white 50% or green 50% and 63% shade nets in summer for Balady mandarin trees.

Taxon
mandarine1
Outcome
trees be covered with a white shade net of a 50% shading rate or a green shade net of a 50 and 63% shading rate in summer monthse0

Verbatim

e0

“it could be recommended that trees be covered with a white shade net of a 50% shading rate or a green shade net of a 50 and 63% shading rate in summer months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2060–2217 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘‘Balady’’ mandarin trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2353 · show in text ↑

kaolin · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.