Paper · 2024 · HortScience

Partially Substituting Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density with Far-red Photons Differentially Alters Biomass Accumulation and Photochemical Efficiency of Greenhouse Lettuce

Zhengnan Yan; Xin Li; Zhixin Li; et al.

13
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Adding far-red (FR) photons to a constant photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) alters photosynthesis, leaf morphology, and biomass accumulation of horticultural plants. However, the influences of partially substituting PPFD with FR photons under the same extended PPFD (ePPFD) on the growth of greenhouse lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) is still unknown. In this study, loose-leaf lettuce (‘Dasusheng’) grown in a greenhouse in the fall was implemented using six supplementary light treatments including white plus red (WR) LEDs with substitutive FR photon flux density at 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90 µmol·m −2 ·s −1 under the same ePPFD (WR139, WR129+FR10, WR109+FR30, WR89+FR50, WR69+FR70, and WR49+FR90, respectively). Lettuce grown with natural light only was designated as NL. The results indicated that supplementary light led to lower plant height, thicker leaves, higher biomass accumulation, higher vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar content in lettuce compared with those of lettuce grown under NL. Lettuce grown under WR139 resulted in a 40.0% decrease in plant height, 66.8% increase in leaf thickness, and 34.1% increase in shoot fresh weight compared with those of lettuce grown under NL. No significant differences were observed in leaf width, specific leaf area, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, soil plant analysis development value, apparent quantum yield, soluble protein content, and light use efficiency of lettuce among the WR139, WR129+FR10, and WR109+FR30 treatments. Furthermore, decreased trends were observed in the biomass accumulation and maximum net photosynthetic rate of lettuce with the increased substituted FR photon flux density. However, an opposite trend was found in the maximum photochemical quantum yield. In conclusion, partially substituting PPFD with FR photons at 10 to 30 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 had similar effects on the biomass accumulation and nutritional quality of greenhouse lettuce. The FR photons should be applied with the consideration of photon flux density because the results also demonstrated negative effects of excess substituted FR photons for PPFD.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary light lowered lettuce height relative to natural light.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
supplementary lighte0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary light led to lower plant height, thicker leaves, higher biomass accumulation, higher vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar content in lettuce compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary light made lettuce leaves thicker than natural light.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
supplementary lighte0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
thickere0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary light led to lower plant height, thicker leaves, higher biomass accumulation, higher vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar content in lettuce compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary light increased lettuce biomass accumulation relative to natural light.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
supplementary lighte0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary light led to lower plant height, thicker leaves, higher biomass accumulation, higher vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar content in lettuce compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplementary light increased lettuce vitamin C, starch, and total soluble sugar content relative to natural light.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
supplementary lighte0
Outcome
vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplementary light led to lower plant height, thicker leaves, higher biomass accumulation, higher vitamin C content, higher starch content, and higher total soluble sugar content in lettuce compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WR139 reduced lettuce height by 40.0% relative to natural light.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
WR139e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
40.0%e0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce grown under WR139 resulted in a 40.0% decrease in plant height, 66.8% increase in leaf thickness, and 34.1% increase in shoot fresh weight compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WR139 increased lettuce leaf thickness by 66.8% relative to natural light.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
WR139e0
Outcome
leaf thicknesse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
66.8%e0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce grown under WR139 resulted in a 40.0% decrease in plant height, 66.8% increase in leaf thickness, and 34.1% increase in shoot fresh weight compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WR139 increased lettuce shoot fresh weight by 34.1% relative to natural light.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
WR139e0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
34.1%e0
Comparator
NLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce grown under WR139 resulted in a 40.0% decrease in plant height, 66.8% increase in leaf thickness, and 34.1% increase in shoot fresh weight compared with those of lettuce grown under NL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three lowest far-red treatments did not differ significantly in listed morphology and biomass measures.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
leaf width, specific leaf area, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weighte0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
WR139, WR129+FR10, and WR109+FR30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in leaf width, specific leaf area, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, soil plant analysis development value, apparent quantum yield, soluble protein content, and light use efficiency of lettuce among the WR139, WR129+FR10, and WR109+FR30 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three lowest far-red treatments did not differ significantly in listed physiological measures.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
soil plant analysis development value, apparent quantum yield, soluble protein content, and light use efficiencye0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
WR139, WR129+FR10, and WR109+FR30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were observed in leaf width, specific leaf area, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, soil plant analysis development value, apparent quantum yield, soluble protein content, and light use efficiency of lettuce among the WR139, WR129+FR10, and WR109+FR30 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1570 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater far-red substitution was associated with declining lettuce biomass accumulation.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
substituted FR photon flux densitye0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased trends were observed in the biomass accumulation and maximum net photosynthetic rate of lettuce with the increased substituted FR photon flux density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1744 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater far-red substitution was associated with declining lettuce maximum net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
substituted FR photon flux densitye0
Outcome
maximum net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased trends were observed in the biomass accumulation and maximum net photosynthetic rate of lettuce with the increased substituted FR photon flux density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1744 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce maximum photochemical quantum yield showed the opposite, increasing trend.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
maximum photochemical quantum yielde0
Qualifier
opposite trende0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, an opposite trend was found in the maximum photochemical quantum yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise considering photon flux density when applying far-red photons because excess substitution had negative effects.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
FR photons should be applied with the consideration of photon flux densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FR photons should be applied with the consideration of photon flux density because the results also demonstrated negative effects of excess substituted FR photons for PPFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Greenhouse Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 243 positive, 57 negative or no effect

242 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

light · physiology: osmolytes · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.