Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Assessment of sweet corn-redgram cropping system under mango based agri-horti system

T Chaitanya; YS Parameshwari; A Krishna; et al.

7
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was carried out with sweet corn-red gram sequence under mango based Agri-horti system with curry leaf as filler crop in light textured marginal lands for better land utilization and getting regular income. A field experiment was carried out in six year old mango orchard with curry leaf as filler crop by intercropping sweetcorn in kharif season and red gram in rabi season for two years 2020-21 and 2021-22 in red sandy loam soil with different nutrient management options viz., T1 - Farmer practice (FYM @ 12 t ha-1), T2 -125% RDN, T3 -100% RDF, T4 -75% RDN + 25% N through FYM, T5 -75% RDN + 25% N through poultry manure, T6 -75% RDN + Azotobacter + PSB/Rhizobium @ 5 kg ha-1 each, T7 -100% RDF (Sole crop without trees). The total system yield was significantly higher with 125% RDF (Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1 and curry leaf yield: 8360 kg ha-1) and it was on par with 75% RDN + 25% N through PM (Sweet corn equivalent yield: 11912 kg ha-1 and curry leaf yield: 8280 kg ha-1), 100% RDF (11583 kg ha-1 and curry leaf yield: 8115 kg ha-1) and 75% RDN + 25% N through FYM (11574 kg ha-1 and curry leaf yield: 8140 kg ha-1). Even though yield, gross and net returns were higher in 125% RDF, percent decline of gross returns was less i.e., 3.8% to 6.5% in integrated application of 75% N through inorganic fertilizer and 25% N through organic manure treatments over 125% RDF, replacement of 25% inorganic manure with organic manure is the best treatment in sustainability point of view. Even we can reduce the cost of cultivation, if the organic manure is available with the farmer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn equivalent yield under 125% RDF was 12449 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
125% RDFe1
Outcome
Sweet corn equivalent yielde5
Direction
highere2
Value
12449 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 125% RDF (Sweet corn equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–780 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn equivalent yield under 75% RDN + 25% N through PM was 11912 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
75% RDN + 25% N through PMe4
Outcome
Sweet corn equivalent yielde5
Direction
highere2
Value
11912 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 11912 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 125% RDF (Sweet corn equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–780 · show in text ↑
e4

“75% RDN + 25% N through PM (Sweet corn equivalent yield: 11912 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–968 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn equivalent yield under 100% RDF was 11583 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
100% RDFe4
Outcome
Sweet corn equivalent yielde5
Direction
highere2
Value
11583 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF (11583 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 125% RDF (Sweet corn equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–780 · show in text ↑
e4

“100% RDF (11583 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1029 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn equivalent yield under 75% RDN + 25% N through FYM was 11574 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
75% RDN + 25% N through FYMe4
Outcome
Sweet corn equivalent yielde5
Direction
highere2
Value
11574 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“75% RDN + 25% N through FYM (11574 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 125% RDF (Sweet corn equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–780 · show in text ↑
e4

“75% RDN + 25% N through FYM (11574 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1112 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sweet corn equivalent yield: 12449 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield, gross returns and net returns were higher under 125% RDF.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
yield, gross and net returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield, gross and net returns were higher in 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated inorganic and organic nutrient treatment reduced gross returns by 3.8% to 6.5% versus 125% RDF.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
integrated application of 75% N through inorganic fertilizer and 25% N through organic manure treatmentse0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
declinee0
Value
3.8% to 6.5%e0
Comparator
125% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“percent decline of gross returns was less i.e., 3.8% to 6.5% in integrated application of 75% N through inorganic fertilizer and 25% N through organic manure treatments over 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend replacing 25% inorganic manure with organic manure for sustainability.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Outcome
replacement of 25% inorganic manure with organic manuree0

Verbatim

e0

“replacement of 25% inorganic manure with organic manure is the best treatment in sustainability point of view”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.