Paper · 2024 · Plant Science Today

Exogenous application of mepiquat chloride and crop geometry alters cotton growth and yield traits of compact cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Dhamodharan P; Somasundaram S; Thirukumaran K; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mepiquat chloride is widely used as a growth regulator in cotton fields to increase crop yield. The present study investigated the effects of growth regulator (mepiquat chloride) and row spacings on compact cotton's growth and yield attributes. An experiment was conducted during summer and winter seasons of 2023-2024 at Cotton Research Station, Veppanthattai and the field trial was designed as a split-split plot with three main plots (Varieties - CO 17, VPT 2, Suraksha), four sub-plots (crop geometry - 90 x 15 cm, 70 x 15 cm, 90 x 10 cm, 70 × 10 cm), and two sub-sub plots (growth regulators - mepiquat chloride @150 ppm, mepiquat chloride + cyclanilide @400 ppm), each replicated three times. Results concluded that the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2. Wider spacing of 90 cm resulted in greater plant height, more sympodial branches and more bolls/m2 to a significantly rise in dry matter production due to the higher number of plants per unit area. Combining mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppm during square initiation and boll development stages significantly increased sympodial branches and bolls/m2, improving seed cotton yield.In contrast, applying mepiquat chloride alone led to more significant biomass accumulation, increased plant height and longer internodal distances. It was suggested that the Suraksha variety be sown at a spacing of 90 x 15 cm and treated with a combination of mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide. This resulted in a plant architecture well-suited for mechanical harvesting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraksha had greater plant height than CO 17 and VPT 2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
CO 17 and VPT 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraksha had higher biomass than CO 17 and VPT 2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CO 17 and VPT 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraksha had more sympodial branches than CO 17 and VPT 2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Outcome
sympodial branchese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
CO 17 and VPT 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraksha had higher bolls/m2 than CO 17 and VPT 2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Outcome
bolls/m2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CO 17 and VPT 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suraksha had higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CO 17 and VPT 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Suraksha variety showed superior performance with greater plant height, higher biomass, more sympodial branches, higher bolls/m2 and higher seed cotton yield than CO 17 and VPT 2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 90 cm spacing increased plant height.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Wider spacing of 90 cme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing of 90 cm resulted in greater plant height, more sympodial branches and more bolls/m2 to a significantly rise in dry matter production due to the higher number of plants per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 90 cm spacing increased sympodial branches.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Wider spacing of 90 cme0
Outcome
sympodial branchese0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing of 90 cm resulted in greater plant height, more sympodial branches and more bolls/m2 to a significantly rise in dry matter production due to the higher number of plants per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 90 cm spacing increased bolls/m2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Wider spacing of 90 cme0
Outcome
bolls/m2e0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing of 90 cm resulted in greater plant height, more sympodial branches and more bolls/m2 to a significantly rise in dry matter production due to the higher number of plants per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 90 cm spacing increased dry matter production.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Wider spacing of 90 cme0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
risee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wider spacing of 90 cm resulted in greater plant height, more sympodial branches and more bolls/m2 to a significantly rise in dry matter production due to the higher number of plants per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide increased sympodial branches.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
square initiation and boll development stagese0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppme0
Outcome
sympodial branchese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppm during square initiation and boll development stages significantly increased sympodial branches and bolls/m2, improving seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide increased bolls/m2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
square initiation and boll development stagese0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppme0
Outcome
bolls/m2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppm during square initiation and boll development stages significantly increased sympodial branches and bolls/m2, improving seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide increased seed cotton yield.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Organ / stage
square initiation and boll development stagese0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppme0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining mepiquat chloride with cyclanilide at 400 ppm during square initiation and boll development stages significantly increased sympodial branches and bolls/m2, improving seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride alone increased biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride alonee0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying mepiquat chloride alone led to more significant biomass accumulation, increased plant height and longer internodal distances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride alone increased plant height.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride alonee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying mepiquat chloride alone led to more significant biomass accumulation, increased plant height and longer internodal distances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride alone increased internodal distances.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride alonee0
Outcome
internodal distancese0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying mepiquat chloride alone led to more significant biomass accumulation, increased plant height and longer internodal distances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommended Suraksha at 90 x 15 cm with mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide for mechanical harvest.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutumt0
Material
Surakshae0
Treatment
combination of mepiquat chloride and cyclanilidee0
Outcome
plant architecture well-suited for mechanical harvestinge0
Qualifier
90 x 15 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was suggested that the Suraksha variety be sown at a spacing of 90 x 15 cm and treated with a combination of mepiquat chloride and cyclanilide. This resulted in a plant architecture well-suited for mechanical harvesting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–149 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

cyclanilide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cyclanilide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.