Paper · 2016 · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Early development of cotton as affected by seed treatment with cyclanilide combined with mepiquat chloride

L.C.S. Soares; J.P.A. Raphael; H.R. Carvalho; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were carried out with the purpose of studying effects of the plant growth regulators (PGR) mepiquat chloride (MC) and cyclanilide (CY) as seed treatments on the early growth of cotton. Seeds of cultivars NuOpal, Fibermax-993, Fibermax-910, FMT-701 and FMT-523 were treated with MC (4.50 g kg-1 seed), MC+CY (1.60+0.40 g kg-1 seed) and MC+CY (4.50+1.12 g kg-1 seed). In laboratory, seed storage periods of 4 and 50 days were also tested. MC+CY treatments decreased plant height by approximately 50%, whereas MC decreased plant height about 30 to 40%. The greatest and lowest rates of MC+CY decreased the height of cotyledon node by 33 and 12% compared to MC treatment, respectively. MC and control treatments did not differ from each other on radicle length (RaL), taproot length (RL) and secondary root initiation depth (SRI). The greatest MC+CY rate resulted in the greatest SRI values, increased RL by 7% and RaL by 29% compared to the control. Seed storage period did not affect consistently the performance of treated seeds. Short-cycle cultivars have a greater sensitivity to seed treatment with PGRs, whereas CY synergizes with MC to reduce shoot growth and inhibits emission of secondary roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined MC and CY reduced cotton plant height by approximately 50%.

Treatment
MC+CY treatmentse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
approximately 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC+CY treatments decreased plant height by approximately 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC reduced cotton plant height by about 30 to 40%.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30 to 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC decreased plant height about 30 to 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest MC+CY rate reduced cotyledon node height by 33% relative to MC.

Treatment
greateste0
Outcome
height of cotyledon nodee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33e0
Comparator
MC treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest and lowest rates of MC+CY decreased the height of cotyledon node by 33 and 12% compared to MC treatment, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest MC+CY rate reduced cotyledon node height by 12% relative to MC.

Treatment
loweste0
Outcome
height of cotyledon nodee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
MC treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest and lowest rates of MC+CY decreased the height of cotyledon node by 33 and 12% compared to MC treatment, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC and control did not differ in radicle length, taproot length or secondary root initiation depth.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
radicle length (RaL), taproot length (RL) and secondary root initiation depth (SRI)e0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC and control treatments did not differ from each other on radicle length (RaL), taproot length (RL) and secondary root initiation depth (SRI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest MC+CY rate produced the greatest secondary root initiation depth.

Treatment
greatest MC+CY ratee0
Outcome
SRI valuese0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest MC+CY rate resulted in the greatest SRI values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“secondary root initiation depth (SRI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest MC+CY rate increased taproot length by 7% against control.

Treatment
greatest MC+CY ratee2
Outcome
RLe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased RL by 7% and RaL by 29% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“taproot length (RL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–821 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greatest MC+CY rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest MC+CY rate increased radicle length by 29% against control.

Treatment
greatest MC+CY ratee2
Outcome
RaLe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased RL by 7% and RaL by 29% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“radicle length (RaL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–800 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greatest MC+CY rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed storage duration did not consistently affect treated seed performance.

Treatment
Seed storage periode0
Outcome
performance of treated seedse0
Direction
did not affect consistentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed storage period did not affect consistently the performance of treated seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1066 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-cycle cultivars were more sensitive to seed PGR treatment.

Material
Short-cycle cultivarse0
Treatment
seed treatment with PGRse0
Outcome
sensitivitye0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Short-cycle cultivars have a greater sensitivity to seed treatment with PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CY synergized with MC to reduce cotton shoot growth.

Treatment
CYe0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
reducee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CY synergizes with MC to reduce shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CY with MC inhibited emission of secondary roots.

Treatment
CYe0
Outcome
emission of secondary rootse0
Direction
inhibitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CY synergizes with MC to reduce shoot growth and inhibits emission of secondary roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

cyclanilide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.