Paper · 2024 · Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry

Effect of Treating Alfalfa Seeds with Gibberellin and Nano-fertilizer on Productive Characteristics and Protein Content in Hydroponic Cultures

Mohammed Amin Walid Al-Amin; Abdul Sattar Asmir Al-Rajbo

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out in an experiment in an incubator designed for hydroponic seed germination with tight thermal insulation in the laboratories of the Department of Plant Production Technologies at the Technical College of Agriculture in Mosul, which is affiliated with the Northern Technical University in Iraq, where the seeds of the Dutch variety alfalfa (Medicago sativa. L) were germinated commercially and four times between 2022 and 2024. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design (CRD) with two factors and three replicates in perforated dishes with dimensions of 28 cm in length and 19 cm in width (area 532 cm2) at a seed rate of kg / m2, resulting in an average seed weight of 53 g in one dish. The first experimental factor was the germination periods, while the second factor was soaking the seeds in solutions of varying amounts made from gibberellin and nano-compound fertilizer with the comparison treatment, which is soaking in water alone, as follows: Gibberellin 100 ppm and given the symbol GA 100ppm- Gibberellin 200 ppm and given the symbol 200ppm GA- --Nano fertilizer 20:20:20 NPK at a concentration of 2000 ppm and given the symbol NPK2000ppm. -Nano fertilizer 20:20:20 NPK at a concentration of 4000 ppm and given the symbol NPK4000ppm. This study showed that the Gibberellin 200ppm GA treatment was significantly superior to the rest of the other soaking treatments in the characteristics of the height of the incubator (3.66 cm), as well as the wet weight of both seedlings and roots and their dry weight, which were (497.88, 56.97g/dish-1), respectively, The fresh and dried root weights were considerably greater in the same treatment, at (400.86 and 43.86 g/dish-1), respectively. while the comparison treatment was superior. Morally, it was significantly superior to the rest of the other soaking treatments in the characteristic of protein in the medium was (18.29%). As for the times of hydroponic seed germination, there were no significant differences between the times in all the studied characteristics, which enhances the high degree of incubator isolation, the accuracy of implementing the experiment, and the accuracy of taking the results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking alfalfa seeds in gibberellin 200 ppm was significantly superior to the other soaking treatments for height of the incubator (3.66 cm).

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Gibberellin 200ppm GAe0
Outcome
height of the incubatore0
Direction
superiore0
Value
3.66 cme0
Comparator
the rest of the other soaking treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gibberellin 200ppm GA treatment was significantly superior to the rest of the other soaking treatments in the characteristics of the height of the incubator (3.66 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin 200 ppm gave superior wet weight of seedlings and roots and their dry weight (497.88, 56.97 g/dish).

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Gibberellin 200ppm GAe0
Outcome
wet weight of both seedlings and roots and their dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
497.88, 56.97g/dish-1e0
Comparator
the rest of the other soaking treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gibberellin 200ppm GA treatment was significantly superior to the rest of the other soaking treatments in the characteristics of the height of the incubator (3.66 cm), as well as the wet weight of both seedlings and roots and their dry weight, which were (497.88, 56.97g/dish-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dried root weights were considerably greater under gibberellin 200 ppm (400.86 and 43.86 g/dish).

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Gibberellin 200ppm GAe0
Outcome
fresh and dried root weightse1
Direction
greatere1
Value
400.86 and 43.86 g/dish-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Gibberellin 200ppm GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“The fresh and dried root weights were considerably greater in the same treatment, at (400.86 and 43.86 g/dish-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in water alone (comparison treatment) was significantly superior to the other soaking treatments for protein (18.29%).

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
comparison treatmente0
Outcome
protein in the mediume0
Direction
superiore0
Value
18.29%e0
Comparator
the rest of the other soaking treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“the comparison treatment was superior. Morally, it was significantly superior to the rest of the other soaking treatments in the characteristic of protein in the medium was (18.29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroponic germination times showed no significant differences in any of the studied characteristics.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
times of hydroponic seed germinatione0
Outcome
studied characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“As for the times of hydroponic seed germination, there were no significant differences between the times in all the studied characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2070 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

class · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.