Paper · 2024 · Plant Soil and Environment

Biochar distribution mode in soil affects the vegetative peanut growth, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-fixing bacteria activity

Xiangzhu Wang; Man Wu; Chengbin Sun; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Biochar plays an important role in agricultural production as it can improve soil fertility, promote nutrient adsorption and enhance plant growth. However, the distribution of biochar in the soil significantly impacts its application effect. In order to investigate the impact of non-uniform biochar distribution on soil nutrient uptake, root shape, peanut development, and the makeup of soil microbial communities, we carried out greenhouse peanut pot studies. This experiment followed a completely randomised design with four treatments, each with three replications. The four treatments were as follows: no biochar application (B0); concentrated biochar application near seeds (B1); relatively concentrated surface application of biochar (B2), and uniformly dispersed application of biochar (B3). The findings demonstrated that, compared to the no-biochar scenario, the aboveground and root nitrogen uptake was significantly (P < 0.05) improved by the B2 treatment, increasing by 42.79% and 51.39%, respectively, compared to the control group. Additionally, it reduced the concentrations of NO3–-N and NH4+-N in the soil. The B2 treatment also significantly (P < 0.05) increased the net photosynthetic rate and aboveground dry matter weight, increasing by 196.85% and 53.96%, respectively, compared to the B0 treatment. The B1 and B3 treatments also demonstrated a higher promoting effect. The growth of the root system and the quantity of root nodules were promoted by the addition of biochar. The number of root nodules in the B2 treatment was 72.22% higher than that in the control group. In terms of microbial and bacterial communities, the addition of biochar increased the number of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to a certain extent, while the relative abundance of soil bacterial communities showed no significant differences. In general, the non-uniform distribution of biochar in the soil significantly affected peanuts’ vegetative growth and developmental effects. The relatively concentrated surface application of biochar treatments contributes to improving plant nutrient uptake and root system development. This provides a more effective application method for agricultural personnel to apply biochar fertiliser in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar increased aboveground nitrogen uptake by 42.79%.

Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
abovegrounde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
42.79%e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aboveground and root nitrogen uptake was significantly (P < 0.05) improved by the B2 treatment, increasing by 42.79% and 51.39%, respectively, compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar increased root nitrogen uptake by 51.39%.

Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
root nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
51.39%e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aboveground and root nitrogen uptake was significantly (P < 0.05) improved by the B2 treatment, increasing by 42.79% and 51.39%, respectively, compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar lowered soil nitrate and ammonium concentrations.

Outcome
concentrations of NO3–-N and NH4+-N in the soile0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, it reduced the concentrations of NO3–-N and NH4+-N in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar increased net photosynthetic rate by 196.85%.

Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
196.85%e0
Comparator
B0 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B2 treatment also significantly (P < 0.05) increased the net photosynthetic rate and aboveground dry matter weight, increasing by 196.85% and 53.96%, respectively, compared to the B0 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar increased aboveground dry matter weight by 53.96%.

Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
aboveground dry matter weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.96%e0
Comparator
B0 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B2 treatment also significantly (P < 0.05) increased the net photosynthetic rate and aboveground dry matter weight, increasing by 196.85% and 53.96%, respectively, compared to the B0 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B1 and B3 biochar treatments also promoted growth.

Treatment
B1 and B3 treatmentse0
Outcome
higher promoting effecte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B1 and B3 treatments also demonstrated a higher promoting effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar promoted root-system growth.

Treatment
addition of biochare0
Outcome
growth of the root systeme0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the root system and the quantity of root nodules were promoted by the addition of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar promoted root nodule quantity.

Treatment
addition of biochare0
Outcome
quantity of root nodulese0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the root system and the quantity of root nodules were promoted by the addition of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1496 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B2 increased root nodule number by 72.22%.

Treatment
B2 treatmente0
Outcome
number of root nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Value
72.22%e0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of root nodules in the B2 treatment was 72.22% higher than that in the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased nitrogen-fixing bacteria numbers.

Treatment
addition of biochare0
Interactor
nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
number of nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of biochar increased the number of nitrogen-fixing bacteria to a certain extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1736 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundance of soil bacterial communities did not differ significantly.

Outcome
relative abundance of soil bacterial communitiese0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative abundance of soil bacterial communities showed no significant differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Surface biochar application is proposed to improve nutrient uptake and root development.

Outcome
improving plant nutrient uptake and root system developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relatively concentrated surface application of biochar treatments contributes to improving plant nutrient uptake and root system development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1973–2117 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–70 · show in text ↑

biochar · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biochar · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.