Paper · 2024 · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management

Influence of tillage and rotation sequence on corn response and planting pattern

M. Scott Tilley; David L. Jordan; Rachel A. Vann; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plain Language Summary Corn ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) are traditional crops grown in the southeast region of the United States. Row crop producers have adopted many strategies to reduce the presence of disease and parasitic nematodes among peanut. One management strategy that has not been considered is the potential use of twin‐row planting patterns compared to single‐row cropping systems under various tillage practices. The objective of this study is to determine if corn yield differs when comparing twin‐row and single‐row planting patterns when planted in various rotation sequences following corn, cotton, and peanut in continuous strip tillage or conventional tillage. Results indicated that corn yield increased as the length of rotation increased relative to peanut. Furthermore, the increase in the planting of cotton within the rotation also increased corn yield. The use of strip tillage increased corn yield compared to conventional. No significant yield increase was seen when comparing twin‐row to single‐row.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin-row planting did not significantly increase corn yield compared with single-row planting.

Treatment
twin‐rowe2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
No significant yield increasee2
Comparator
single‐rowe2
Setting
southeast region of the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) are traditional crops grown in the southeast region of the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“No significant yield increase was seen when comparing twin‐row to single‐row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield increased as the length of the rotation increased relative to peanut.

Treatment
length of rotatione3
Outcome
corn yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
peanute3
Setting
southeast region of the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) are traditional crops grown in the southeast region of the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–183 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results indicated that corn yield increased as the length of rotation increased relative to peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased planting of cotton within the rotation increased corn yield.

Treatment
planting of cotton within the rotatione4
Outcome
corn yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
southeast region of the United Statese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) are traditional crops grown in the southeast region of the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–183 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, the increase in the planting of cotton within the rotation also increased corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strip tillage increased corn yield compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
strip tillagee5
Outcome
corn yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
conventionale5
Setting
southeast region of the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn ( Zea mays L.), cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.), and peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) are traditional crops grown in the southeast region of the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–183 · show in text ↑
e5

“The use of strip tillage increased corn yield compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1005 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.