Abstract
The current study was conducted in the pre-Azov agricultural area of the Rostov region in the stationary trial of the FSBSI FRARC in 2020–2023. The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of elements of cultivation technology methods, such as methods of basic tillage, seed sowing rates and a level of mineral nutrition on productivity of new winter wheat varieties in the conditions of ordinary blackearth in the Rostov region. The objects of the study were two new winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ developed in the FSBSI FRARC. The scheme of the trial included three factors for each variety. The experiment was repeated three times. When conducting the study, there was used the generally accepted methodology of a field trial. The effect of different rates of mineral fertilizers and seed sowing with different methods of basic tillage affected the grain productivity of new winter wheat varieties. As a result of three-year study, there has been found a positive effect of moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance for both varieties, which provided the best productivity of 6.66–7.02 t/ha. There has been established a tendency for changes in productivity of new winter wheat varieties under the effect of the studied elements of agricultural technology, for which there have been identified individual factors and calculated the mean productivity independently of the other two factors, taking into account the experimental options for each of them. The largest mean grain productivity of the winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance, which made it possible to improve productivity by 48.3–49.4 % compared to the control without fertilizers. There has been determined an optimal background of mineral nutrition N 80 Р 60 К 60 kg/ha of active substance, which ensured the maximum feedback of grain due to fertilizers. The variety ‘Akapella’ in all experimental variants produced grain on 4.5–5.1 % higher than that of the variety ‘Bylina Dona’.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Moldboard plowing with the stated seeding and nutrition rates gave Bylina Dona the best productivity range.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- ‘Bylina Dona’e2
- Treatment
- moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substancee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 6.66–7.02 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance for both varieties, which provided the best productivity of 6.66–7.02 t/ha”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance for both varieties, which provided the best productivity of 6.66–7.02 t/ha”
e2“‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination gave Akapella the best productivity range.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substancee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 6.66–7.02 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance for both varieties, which provided the best productivity of 6.66–7.02 t/ha”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“moldboard plowing and a seeding rate of 5 million pcs./ha against the background of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance for both varieties, which provided the best productivity of 6.66–7.02 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Highest mineral nutrition gave Bylina Dona mean grain productivity of 5.77 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- ‘Bylina Dona’e0
- Treatment
- N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substancee0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- largeste0
- Value
- 5.77e0
- Qualifier
- t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The largest mean grain productivity of the winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“The largest mean grain productivity of the winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance”
Claim · model-written summary
Highest mineral nutrition gave Akapella mean grain productivity of 6.05 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- ‘Akapella’e0
- Treatment
- N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substancee0
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- largeste0
- Value
- 6.05 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The largest mean grain productivity of the winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“The largest mean grain productivity of the winter wheat varieties ‘Bylina Dona’ and ‘Akapella’ with 5.77 and 6.05 t/ha, respectively, was provided by the highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance”
Claim · model-written summary
Highest mineral nutrition improved productivity by 48.3–49.4% versus unfertilized controls.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substancee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
- Value
- 48.3–49.4 %e0
- Comparator
- control without fertilizerse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance, which made it possible to improve productivity by 48.3–49.4 % compared to the control without fertilizers”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“highest level of mineral nutrition, with a norm of N 120 Р 80 К 80 kg/ha of active substance, which made it possible to improve productivity by 48.3–49.4 % compared to the control without fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
N 80 P 60 K 60 was identified as the optimal nutrition level for maximum grain response to fertilizer.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- optimal background of mineral nutrition N 80 Р 60 К 60 kg/ha of active substancee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“optimal background of mineral nutrition N 80 Р 60 К 60 kg/ha of active substance, which ensured the maximum feedback of grain due to fertilizers”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“optimal background of mineral nutrition N 80 Р 60 К 60 kg/ha of active substance, which ensured the maximum feedback of grain due to fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Akapella grain productivity exceeded Bylina Dona by 4.5–5.1% across treatments.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- ‘Akapella’e0
- Outcome
- produced graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.5–5.1 %e0
- Comparator
- ‘Bylina Dona’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The variety ‘Akapella’ in all experimental variants produced grain on 4.5–5.1 % higher than that of the variety ‘Bylina Dona’”
t0“winter wheat”
t1“winter wheat”
e1“The variety ‘Akapella’ in all experimental variants produced grain on 4.5–5.1 % higher than that of the variety ‘Bylina Dona’”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.