Paper · 2024 · Journal of Economic Impact

Economic Impact of Cotton-Raya Relay Cropping on Crop Yield and Soil Health: A Strategic Approach to Climate Resilience and Profit Maximization

Abdul Khaliq; Iqbal Hussain; Syed Ahtisham Masood; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Climate change, soil degradation, and depletion of natural resources challenge agricultural productivity and economic sustainability. Developing resilient agricultural systems is crucial for food security amid these changes. Relay cropping, where one plant species is inter-seeded into an established crop, maintains continuous plant cover, optimizes resource use, and enhances climate resilience. Therefore, the objective of research was to assess the economic benefits of relay cropping systems in enhancing crop yield and improving soil health. It aims to identify how these practices contribute to climate resilience and maximize farm profitability, offering strategic insights for sustainable agriculture in the face of climate change. Brassica (Raya/Mustard) was sown in standing cotton as a relay crop on first week of October- using 3 kg seed/acre, and also a sole crop to compare the results. Economic analysis over three seasons shows that relay cropping consistently achieved higher net profits compared to sole cropping. Results showed that in 2022-23, cotton relay cropping yielded higher with a net profit of Rs. 66,950, compared to sole cotton and a net profit of Rs. 39,200. Relay cropping also improved soil health, with higher soil organic matter levels observed; for example, in 2022-23, cotton relay cropping had 0.78% soil organic matter compared to 0.63% in sole cotton. Although sole cropping offered higher yields for Brassica, relay cropping resulted in better soil nutrient levels. Overall, the relay cropping system yielded a combined net profit of Rs. 130,630 in 2022-23. These findings highlight relay cropping’s potential to enhance farm profitability and sustainability by addressing resource use inefficiencies, reducing input costs, and stabilizing yields, making it a strategic choice for climate resilience and economic stability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton relay cropping yielded higher than sole cotton.

Treatment
cotton relay croppinge0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole cottone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton relay cropping yielded higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to sole cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay cropping improved soil organic matter relative to sole cotton in 2022-23.

Treatment
cotton relay croppinge0
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
highere1
Value
0.78%e0
Qualifier
0.63%e0
Comparator
sole cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2022-23, cotton relay cropping had 0.78% soil organic matter compared to 0.63% in sole cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1391 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher soil organic matter levels observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole cropping gave higher Brassica yields than relay cropping.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicae0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
relay croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole cropping offered higher yields for Brassica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“relay cropping resulted in better soil nutrient levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay cropping resulted in better soil nutrient levels.

Outcome
soil nutrient levelse0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relay cropping resulted in better soil nutrient levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton-Raya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay cropping produced higher net profits than sole cropping over three seasons.

Outcome
net profitse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relay cropping consistently achieved higher net profits compared to sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton-Raya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton relay cropping had net profit of Rs. 66,950 versus Rs. 39,200 for sole cotton in 2022-23.

Outcome
net profite0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 66,950e0
Qualifier
Rs. 39,200e0
Comparator
sole cottone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2022-23, cotton relay cropping yielded higher with a net profit of Rs. 66,950, compared to sole cotton and a net profit of Rs. 39,200”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1189 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relay cropping system had combined net profit of Rs. 130,630 in 2022-23.

Outcome
combined net profite0
Value
Rs. 130,630e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relay cropping system yielded a combined net profit of Rs. 130,630 in 2022-23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton-Raya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

104 papers: 85 positive, 19 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

intercropping · yield · BrassicaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.