Abstract

Commercial strawberry ( Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) production in Florida relies heavily on bare-root transplants, which typically have 3–5 leaves with partially desiccated roots. Successful establishment requires sprinkler irrigation during daylight hours for the first 10–14 days, leading to substantial water consumption. To address this issue, we evaluated the efficacy of intermittent sprinkler irrigation as a water conservation strategy. We conducted field experiments over two growing seasons [Season 1 (2021–22) and Season 2 (2022–23)] in west-central Florida using three major strawberry cultivars, ‘Florida127’, ‘Florida Brilliance’, and ‘FL 16.30–128’. Plants were subjected to four different intermittent irrigation programs during establishment: 10/0 (continuous irrigation), 10/10, 10/15, and 10/20 min (on/off) from 0800 to 1800 HR for 12 days after transplanting. The impact of intermittent irrigation on marketable yield was cultivar- and season-dependent. 'Florida Brilliance' exhibited a 27 % yield increase in Season 1 but no significant difference in Season 2. By contrast, the other two cultivars exhibited no significant yield response in either season. In ‘Florida Brilliance’, marketable yield was strongly correlated with early canopy growth, suggesting that the yield increase was due partly to accelerated canopy establishment. This surprising result could be explained by the role of stress-induced leaf senescence in enhancing acclimation to adverse environmental conditions. It is speculated that increased heat stress from intermittent irrigation promotes senescence of initial leaves, facilitating nutrient translocation to the crown and subsequently accelerating the formation of new leaves and roots. Our results demonstrate that, without significant yield loss, intermittent sprinkler irrigation can reduce water use by 50–67 % during the establishment of strawberry bare-root transplants, accounting for 322–429 mm of water saving (3.2–4.3 million liters per hectare). Importantly, this water-conservation practice is easy to implement and does not negatively impact fruit quality. • Intermittent sprinkler saves 322–429 mm of water during strawberry establishment. • Intermittent sprinkler does not compromise strawberry yield and fruit quality. • Intermittent sprinkler can increase strawberry yield depending on cultivars. • Intermittent sprinkler can be automated and is easy to implement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florida Brilliance marketable yield rose 27 % in Season 1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
'Florida Brilliance'e0
Treatment
Intermittent sprinkler irrigationt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27 %e0
Qualifier
Season 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Florida Brilliance' exhibited a 27 % yield increase in Season 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Florida Brilliance yield had no significant difference in Season 2.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
'Florida Brilliance'e0
Treatment
Intermittent sprinkler irrigationt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
Season 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Florida Brilliance' exhibited a 27 % yield increase in Season 1 but no significant difference in Season 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) bare-root transplants conserves water without loss of yield and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other two cultivars had no significant yield response in either season.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Intermittent sprinkler irrigationt0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
no significante0
Qualifier
either seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other two cultivars exhibited no significant yield response in either season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florida Brilliance marketable yield correlated strongly with early canopy growth.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Material
‘Florida Brilliance’e0
Organ / stage
early canopy growthe0
Outcome
marketable yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In ‘Florida Brilliance’, marketable yield was strongly correlated with early canopy growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation reduced establishment water use by 50–67 %.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
intermittent sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
reducee0
Value
50–67 %e0
Qualifier
322–429 mm of water savinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intermittent sprinkler irrigation can reduce water use by 50–67 % during the establishment of strawberry bare-root transplants, accounting for 322–429 mm of water saving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation had no significant yield loss.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
intermittent sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
withoute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without significant yield loss, intermittent sprinkler irrigation can reduce water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1851 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent irrigation did not negatively affect fruit quality.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Intermittent sprinkler irrigationt0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
does not negatively impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“does not negatively impact fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intermittent sprinkler irrigation during the establishment of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) bare-root transplants conserves water without loss of yield and fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.