Paper · 2017 · Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering

Irrigation Management Scale and Water Application Method to ImproveYield and Water Use Efficiency of Field Grown Strawberries

Letourneau G; Caron J

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improvements in water use efficiency are of primary importance for maintaining agricultural productivity and sustainability. Irrigation management based on soil water potential has proven effective for this purpose with many different crops, including strawberries. However, problems related to the spatial variability of soil properties and inadequate water application methods were reported when applying soil water potential-based irrigation to strawberries in soils with a significant proportion of rock fragments. In this study, a field-scale experiment was performed to simultaneously evaluate the impacts of three irrigation management scales and a pulsed water application method on strawberry yield and water use efficiency. An analytical solution to Richards equation was also used to establish critical root zone soil water potentials for this crop and evaluate the effects of the observed variability in the soil hydraulic properties. The results showed that spatial variability of the soil properties at the experimental site was important but most likely not enough to influence the crop response to irrigation practices. The studied properties did not present any spatial structure that could allow establishing specific management zones. A four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zones had no effect on yield and increased the applied irrigation water volume. Pulsed water application lead to significant increases in yield (22%) and water use efficiency (36%) compared with the standard water application method used by the producer at the experimental site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial variability of soil properties was judged insufficient to influence strawberry irrigation response.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
crop response to irrigation practicese0
Qualifier
most likely not enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spatial variability of the soil properties at the experimental site was important but most likely not enough to influence the crop response to irrigation practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil properties lacked spatial structure suitable for specific irrigation management zones.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
spatial structuree0
Direction
did not presente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The studied properties did not present any spatial structure that could allow establishing specific management zones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourfold smaller irrigation zones had no effect on strawberry yield.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zonese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zones had no effect on yield and increased the applied irrigation water volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourfold smaller irrigation zones increased applied irrigation water volume.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zonese0
Outcome
applied irrigation water volumee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-fold reduction in the size of the irrigation management zones had no effect on yield and increased the applied irrigation water volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulsed water application increased strawberry yield by 22% versus standard application.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Pulsed water applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
standard water application methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pulsed water application lead to significant increases in yield (22%) and water use efficiency (36%) compared with the standard water application method used by the producer at the experimental site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulsed water application increased strawberry water use efficiency by 36% versus standard application.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Pulsed water applicatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasese0
Value
36%e0
Comparator
standard water application methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pulsed water application lead to significant increases in yield (22%) and water use efficiency (36%) compared with the standard water application method used by the producer at the experimental site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.