Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

Influence of nitrogen treatments on some nutrient concentration and bioactive compounds of broccoli

Ercan Ekbic; Gulhan Kose

13
claims
44
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nitrogen fertilization in broccoli is very important for plant growth and productivity. However, it is known that the nitrogen source of the nitrogen fertilizer is also effective on quality parameters. In this study we investigated the effects of different nitrogen sources (ammonium sulphate and calcium nitrate) on bioactive compounds and leaf nutrients of broccoli cultivars (Monet, Italian and Karadede). The highest total phenolic content was 0.24 mg g− 1 fw in cultivar Monet. Nitrate-based fertilizer treatments provided higher total phenolic (0.28 mg g− 1 fw) and flavonoid (0.56 mg g1 fw) contents and FRAP (0.24 mmol g− 1 fw) values compared to ammonium-based fertilizer treatments. On the other hand, DPPH (0.77 mmol g− 1 fw) values were higher in the ammonium nitrogen treatments. Among the cultivars, Monet had the highest total phenolics, flavonoids and FRAP values. When leaf nutrient concentrations were analyzed, ammonium sulfate application resulted in higher sulfur (0.86%), zinc (20.72 mg kg− 1) and manganese (28.80 mg kg− 1) concentrations compared to calcium nitrate. Calcium nitrate treatment provided the highest calcium (2.09%) and iron (37.50 mg kg− 1) concentration in Monet cultivar. Phosphorus (0.31–0.35%) and magnesium (0.073–0.084%) concentrations differed among cultivars. In conclusion, the choice of nitrogen source and cultivar in broccoli cultivation plays an important role in the bioactive compound profile and nutrient composition of the broccoli crop. The results provide useful information for the improvement of broccoli quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content was highest, at 0.24 mg g-1 fw, in broccoli cultivar Monet.

Material
Monete1
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest total phenolic content was 0.24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–452 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cultivar Monet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-based fertilizer gave higher total phenolic values (0.28) than ammonium-based fertilizer in broccoli.

Treatment
Nitrate-based fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
total phenolice0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.28e0
Comparator
ammonium-based fertilizer treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrate-based fertilizer treatments provided higher total phenolic (0.28”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–555 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to ammonium-based fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-based fertilizer gave higher flavonoid values (0.56) than ammonium-based fertilizer in broccoli.

Treatment
Nitrate-based fertilizer treatmentse1
Outcome
flavonoide0
Direction
highere1
Value
0.56e0
Comparator
ammonium-based fertilizer treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“flavonoid (0.56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–587 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrate-based fertilizer treatments provided higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–534 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to ammonium-based fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-based fertilizer gave higher FRAP values (0.24) than ammonium-based fertilizer in broccoli.

Treatment
Nitrate-based fertilizer treatmentse1
Outcome
FRAPe0
Direction
highere1
Value
0.24e0
Comparator
ammonium-based fertilizer treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“FRAP (0.24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–621 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrate-based fertilizer treatments provided higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–534 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to ammonium-based fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH values (0.77) were higher under ammonium nitrogen treatments in broccoli.

Treatment
ammonium nitrogen treatmentse1
Outcome
DPPHe0
Direction
highere1
Value
0.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“DPPH (0.77”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“values were higher in the ammonium nitrogen treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–791 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among broccoli cultivars, Monet had the highest total phenolics, flavonoids and FRAP values.

Material
Monete0
Outcome
total phenolics, flavonoids and FRAP valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Monet had the highest total phenolics, flavonoids and FRAP values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate application gave higher leaf sulfur concentration (0.86%) than calcium nitrate in broccoli.

Treatment
ammonium sulfate applicatione0
Outcome
sulfure0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.86%e0
Comparator
calcium nitratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“ammonium sulfate application resulted in higher sulfur (0.86%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to calcium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate application gave higher leaf zinc concentration (20.72) than calcium nitrate in broccoli.

Treatment
ammonium sulfate applicatione1
Outcome
zince0
Direction
highere1
Value
20.72e0
Comparator
calcium nitratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“zinc (20.72”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“ammonium sulfate application resulted in higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–977 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to calcium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate application gave higher leaf manganese concentration (28.80) than calcium nitrate in broccoli.

Treatment
ammonium sulfate applicatione1
Outcome
manganesee0
Direction
highere1
Value
28.80e0
Comparator
calcium nitratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“manganese (28.80”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“ammonium sulfate application resulted in higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–977 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to calcium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest leaf calcium concentration (2.09%) in cultivar Monet.

Material
Monete1
Treatment
Calcium nitrate treatmente0
Outcome
calciume0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Calcium nitrate treatment provided the highest calcium (2.09%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1153 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Monet cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate treatment gave the highest leaf iron concentration (37.50 mg kg-1) in cultivar Monet.

Material
Monete2
Treatment
Calcium nitrate treatmente1
Outcome
irone0
Direction
higheste1
Value
37.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“iron (37.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“Calcium nitrate treatment provided the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1137 · show in text ↑
e2

“in Monet cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus concentration (0.31-0.35%) differed among broccoli cultivars.

Outcome
Phosphoruse0
Value
0.31–0.35%e0
Qualifier
differed among cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Phosphorus (0.31–0.35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations differed among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf magnesium concentration (0.073-0.084%) differed among broccoli cultivars.

Outcome
magnesiume0
Value
0.073–0.084%e0
Qualifier
differed among cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“magnesium (0.073–0.084%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1265 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations differed among cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1305 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.