Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of foliar application of nano-urea on yield, nutrient uptake and biochemical properties of rainfed cotton in Vertisols

VP Bhone; VV Gabhane; Monika S Bhavsar; et al.

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study entitled, “Effect of foliar application of nano-urea on yield, nutrient uptake and biochemical properties of rainfed cotton in Vertisols” was conducted at research field of AICRP for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra during the year 2023-24 in Kharif season. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with nine treatment and three replications. Nine treatments comprised of control (no fertilizer), 100% RDF (60:30:30 NPK kg ha-1), 100% RDF and spraying of Nano-urea (once-60 DAS), 100% RDF and spraying of Nano-urea (twice- 60 & 90 DAS), 100% RDF and spraying of Nano-urea (thrice-45, 60 & 90 DAS), 75% RDN + Recommended PK, 75% RDN + Recommended PK and spraying of Nano-urea (once-60 DAS),75% RDN + Recommended PK and spraying of Nano-urea (twice- 60 & 90 DAS), 75% RDN + Recommended PK and spraying of Nano-urea (thrice-45, 60 & 90 DAS). The results indicated that the application of 100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/liter resulted in higher nutrient uptake and yield of cotton and was on par with 100% RDF. However, application of 100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/liter resulted in higher improvement in biochemical properties of cotton in Vertisols under rainfed conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK plus nano-urea increased cotton nutrient uptake.

Treatment
100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/litere0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/liter resulted in higher nutrient uptake and yield of cotton and was on par with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK plus nano-urea increased cotton yield.

Treatment
100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/litere0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/liter resulted in higher nutrient uptake and yield of cotton and was on par with 100% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK plus nano-urea improved cotton biochemical properties.

Treatment
100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/litere0
Outcome
biochemical properties of cottone0
Direction
higher improvemente0
Setting
Vertisols under rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recommended NPK and spraying of Nano-urea @ 4 ml/liter resulted in higher improvement in biochemical properties of cotton in Vertisols under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1295 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.