Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Long term conjunctive use of inorganic fertilizers, FYM and gliricidia green leaves on available macro and micronutrients, nutrient balance and productivity of cotton + greengram intercropping system in Vertisols

MS Yerme; VV Gabhane; Monika Bhavsar; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted during kharif season of 2023-24 on the long term experiment initiated during 1987-88 at research farm of AICRP for Dryland Agriculture. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra), to assess the long term conjunctive use of inorganic fertilizers, FYM and gliricidia green leaves on available macro and micronutrients, nutrient balance and productivity of cotton and greengram intercropping system in Vertisols. The results after 37th cycle revealed that there was significant improvement in available macro and micronutrients in soil, nutrient balance and cotton + greengram intercropping productivity with the gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatments as compared to control. The higher available of macro nutrients N (268.7 kg ha-1), P (19.20 kg ha-1) and K (399.4 kg ha-1) and available micro nutrients Fe (9.57 mg kg-1), Mn (11.88 mg kg-1) and Cu (3.43 mg kg-1), Zn (0.69 mg kg-1) with higher cotton and greengram productivity was observed with the application of 50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers. Similarly, the nutrient balance after thirty-seven years of experiment was also higher with the application of 50% N fertilizers + 50% N ha-1 gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 fertilizers. Hence, it can be concluded that the integrated application of 50% N through gliricidia / FYM + 50% N + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers resulted in improvement in available macro and micronutrient in soil, higher crop productivity with higher nutrient balance in cotton + greengram (1:1) intercropping system in Vertisols under rainfed conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia and FYM incorporation significantly improved soil macro and micronutrient availability against control.

Taxon
cotton + greengrame0
Treatment
gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatmentse0
Outcome
available macro and micronutrients in soile0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in available macro and micronutrients in soil, nutrient balance and cotton + greengram intercropping productivity with the gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatments as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia and FYM incorporation significantly improved nutrient balance against control.

Taxon
cotton + greengrame0
Treatment
gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatmentse0
Outcome
nutrient balancee0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in available macro and micronutrients in soil, nutrient balance and cotton + greengram intercropping productivity with the gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatments as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliricidia and FYM incorporation significantly improved cotton and greengram productivity against control.

Taxon
cotton + greengrame0
Treatment
gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatmentse0
Outcome
cotton + greengram intercropping productivitye0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“significant improvement in available macro and micronutrients in soil, nutrient balance and cotton + greengram intercropping productivity with the gliricidia and FYM incorporated treatments as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated fertilizer treatment gave higher soil N availability of 268.7 kg ha-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Treatment
50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizerse1
Outcome
available of macro nutrients Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
268.7 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher available of macro nutrients N (268.7 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated treatment gave higher soil P availability of 19.20 kg ha-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Treatment
50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizerse1
Outcome
Pe0
Value
19.20 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“P (19.20 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified integrated treatment gave higher soil K availability of 399.4 kg ha-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Treatment
50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizerse1
Outcome
Ke0
Value
399.4 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“K (399.4 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment gave soil Fe availability of 9.57 mg kg-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Outcome
Fee0
Value
9.57 mg kg-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Fe (9.57 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment gave soil Mn availability of 11.88 mg kg-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Outcome
Mne0
Value
11.88 mg kg-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Mn (11.88 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment gave soil Cu availability of 3.43 mg kg-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Outcome
Cue0
Value
3.43 mg kg-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Cu (3.43 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified treatment gave soil Zn availability of 0.69 mg kg-1.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Outcome
Zne0
Value
0.69 mg kg-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Zn (0.69 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gliricidia treatment produced higher cotton and greengram productivity.

Treatment
50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizerse0
Outcome
cotton and greengram productivitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with higher cotton and greengram productivity was observed with the application of 50% N through fertilizers + 50% N through gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 through fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gliricidia treatment produced higher nutrient balance after 37 years.

Taxon
cotton + greengramt0
Treatment
50% N fertilizers + 50% N ha-1 gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 fertilizerse0
Outcome
nutrient balancee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient balance after thirty-seven years of experiment was also higher with the application of 50% N fertilizers + 50% N ha-1 gliricidia + 100% P2O5 + 100% K2O ha-1 fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton + greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–178 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.