Abstract
Purpose: to determine rational rates of mineral fertilizer application on young vineyards of table grape varieties with drip irrigation systems. Materials and methods. The studies were conducted in Belogorsk district of the Republic of Crimea in the foothill zone. The soils of the experimental plot are solonetzic chernozem. The studies were conducted on the Podarok Irine variety, zoned for the conditions of the Republic of Crimea. Irrigation with drip irrigation systems was carried out with a decrease in soil moisture in the 0.6 m layer to 75–80 % of minimum water capacity throughout the growing season. The calculated rate of mineral fertilizer application for the planned yield in the control variant was N80P60K60. Results. The highest indicators of plant height and vine ripening were obtained in the experimental variant with a 20 % higher dose of mineral fertilizers. The average net productivity of leaf photosynthesis per day of vegetation in the experimental variants varied from 1.1 to 1.3 g/(sq. m·day) in the first year. In the second year, this indicator changed from 2.0 to 2.7 g/(sq. m·day), and in the third year it was 1.8–2.9 g/(sq. m·day). The obtained dependencies for plant height and shoot ripening made it possible to determine that increasing the fertilizer rate on young grape plantations by more than 20% is inappropriate, since it leads to a decrease in productivity. Conclusions. The yield of the third-year grapes varied within 2.47–2.91 t/ha and was 39–64 % higher than in the variant without fertilizer application. The conducted studies made it possible to state that with an increase in the rates of mineral fertilizers by 10 and 20 %, there was an increase in the yield of the third-year grapes by 4.7 and 9.2 %, respectively. The rational rate of fertilizers on young vineyards on chernozem soils is N96P72K72 under the conditions of the foothill zone of the Republic of Crimea.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
The 20% higher mineral fertilizer dose gave the highest plant height and vine ripening indicators compared with the control variant.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e2“The highest indicators of plant height and vine ripening were obtained in the experimental variant with a 20 % higher dose of mineral fertilizers”
e5“The calculated rate of mineral fertilizer application for the planned yield in the control variant was N80P60K60”
Claim · model-written summary
Net productivity of leaf photosynthesis in the first year varied from 1.1 to 1.3 g/(sq. m·day).
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e3“The average net productivity of leaf photosynthesis per day of vegetation in the experimental variants varied from 1.1 to 1.3 g/(sq. m·day) in the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
Net productivity of leaf photosynthesis in the second year varied from 2.0 to 2.7 g/(sq. m·day).
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e3“The average net productivity of leaf photosynthesis per day of vegetation in the experimental variants varied from 1.1 to 1.3 g/(sq. m·day) in the first year”
e4“In the second year, this indicator changed from 2.0 to 2.7 g/(sq. m·day)”
Claim · model-written summary
Net productivity of leaf photosynthesis in the third year was 1.8–2.9 g/(sq. m·day).
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e3“The average net productivity of leaf photosynthesis per day of vegetation in the experimental variants varied from 1.1 to 1.3 g/(sq. m·day) in the first year”
e5“in the third year it was 1.8–2.9 g/(sq. m·day)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the fertilizer rate on young grape plantations by more than 20% is inappropriate.
Verbatim
e6“increasing the fertilizer rate on young grape plantations by more than 20% is inappropriate, since it leads to a decrease in productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield of third-year grapes varied within 2.47–2.91 t/ha.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e7“The yield of the third-year grapes varied within 2.47–2.91 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield of third-year grapes was 39–64% higher with fertilizer application than in the variant without fertilizer application.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e7“The yield of the third-year grapes varied within 2.47–2.91 t/ha”
e2“was 39–64 % higher than in the variant without fertilizer application”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising mineral fertilizer rates by 10% increased third-year grape yield by 4.7% over the control variant.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e3“with an increase in the rates of mineral fertilizers by 10 and 20 %, there was an increase in the yield of the third-year grapes by 4.7 and 9.2 %, respectively”
e5“The calculated rate of mineral fertilizer application for the planned yield in the control variant was N80P60K60”
Claim · model-written summary
Raising mineral fertilizer rates by 20% increased third-year grape yield by 9.2% over the control variant.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e3“with an increase in the rates of mineral fertilizers by 10 and 20 %, there was an increase in the yield of the third-year grapes by 4.7 and 9.2 %, respectively”
e5“The calculated rate of mineral fertilizer application for the planned yield in the control variant was N80P60K60”
Claim · model-written summary
The rational fertilizer rate for young vineyards on chernozem soils is N96P72K72 in the foothill zone of Crimea.
Verbatim
e1“young vineyards of table grape varieties”
e4“The rational rate of fertilizers on young vineyards on chernozem soils is N96P72K72 under the conditions of the foothill zone of the Republic of Crimea”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.